Tennis · resolved market
Roland Garros WTA (Doubles): Selekhmeteva/Zakharova vs Bucsa/Melichar
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x27762382d8b59d22436cb2f0aa6874bab488e73e6b1f72760b22b4a3a7d1b32c
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Bucsa/Melicharof Selekhmeteva/Zakharova, Bucsa/Melichar
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $5,765
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,773
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $5,765 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x8d04…022bbacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 17c | 925$157 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$157.25 | 145 | 31.7%46 W · 99 L | -5.3wins | -0.04per pick | 35cpaid | -11.7%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1ece…3b9bbacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 20c | 550$111 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$111 | 159 | 66%105 W · 54 L | +1.4wins | +0.01per pick | 65cpaid | -3.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x40f7…1f5ebacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 39c | 450$176 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$175.5 | 747 | 43.6%326 W · 421 L | -6.6wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -8.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x98db…dd17backed Bucsa/Melichar | 67c | 380.57$254 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$126.61 | 5,350 | 56.4%3,016 W · 2,334 L | +228.4wins | +0.04per pick | 52cpaid | -6.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xb4e3…8c11backed Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 17c | 325$56 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$55.75 | 94 | 36.2%34 W · 60 L | -5.4wins | -0.06per pick | 42cpaid | -15.3%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x5fe6…a99fbacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 16c | 216.03$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35 | 753 | 12.2%92 W · 661 L | -21.3wins | -0.03per pick | 15cpaid | -25.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xcf00…353fbacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 16c | 199.38$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31.5 | 242 | 29.8%72 W · 170 L | -5.8wins | -0.02per pick | 32cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x8ccf…aa10backed Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 15c | 140$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.8 | 21 | 61.9%13 W · 8 L | +0.9wins | +0.04per pick | 58cpaid | +6.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x19bd…ae36backed Bucsa/Melichar | 76c | 131.58$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.58 | 94 | 58.5%55 W · 39 L | -1.9wins | -0.02per pick | 61cpaid | +3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9888…e6febacked Bucsa/Melichar | 61c | 101$62 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.39 | 2,447 | 45.9%1,123 W · 1,324 L | -12.9wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -5.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf5ec…23bdbacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 17c | 100$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17 | 167 | 69.5%116 W · 51 L | +5.1wins | +0.03per pick | 66cpaid | +27.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd610…4c9abacked Selekhmeteva/Zakharova | 23c | 100$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23 | 1,212 | 33.1%401 W · 811 L | -16.7wins | -0.01per pick | 34cpaid | -4.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xca97…f3cebacked Bucsa/Melichar | 77c | 100$77 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23 | 67 | 55.2%37 W · 30 L | +1.8wins | +0.03per pick | 52cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x34fa…f491backed Bucsa/Melichar | 78c | 100$78 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22 | 341 | 54.3%185 W · 156 L | +16.1wins | +0.05per pick | 50cpaid | +9.1%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xa509…ae46backed Bucsa/Melichar | 75c | 78$58 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.83 | 6,786 | 48.8%3,310 W · 3,476 L | +56.2wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -15.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe026…0404backed Bucsa/Melichar | 80c | 55$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11 | 39 | 43.6%17 W · 22 L | -3.1wins | -0.08per pick | 52cpaid | -19.8%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x2ecb…7645backed Bucsa/Melichar | 80c | 51.32$41 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.37 | 925 | 48.8%451 W · 474 L | +20.2wins | +0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.