South American Leagues · resolved market
CA Banfield vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x5663d1a47260e609bf39682f482b483e66f7373ba11b4b159138ba839870f2fb
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- South American Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $5,461
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $6,325
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $5,461 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 25 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in South American Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xf301…fa2dbacked Yes | 49c | 461.95$226 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$226.35 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.9wins | -0.45per pick | 45cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xc686…5a55backed Yes | 24c | 399.93$96 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$95.98 | 465 | 30.3%141 W · 324 L | -7.3wins | -0.02per pick | 32cpaid | -12%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Yes | 10c | 275.2$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$26.65 | 8,107 | 48.7%3,948 W · 4,159 L | +26.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -8.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x7ea5…de7bbacked No | 51c | 244.55$124 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$120.11 | 3,405 | 51.3%1,748 W · 1,657 L | +21.3wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +0.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Yes | 9c | 239.79$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.89 | 5,757 | 45.4%2,611 W · 3,146 L | +94.0wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1670…2277backed Yes | 20c | 238$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.6 | 19 | 47.4%9 W · 10 L | +2.0wins | +0.11per pick | 37cpaid | +23.1%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xeab6…d4c6backed Yes | 22c | 221.85$49 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$48.76 | 148 | 24.3%36 W · 112 L | -8.7wins | -0.06per pick | 30cpaid | -36%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xba67…4727backed No | 51c | 206$105 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$100.94 | 213 | 49.8%106 W · 107 L | +0.7wins | 0.00per pick | 49cpaid | +2.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x4277…3154backed Yes | 49c | 196.38$97 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$97.08 | 21 | 38.1%8 W · 13 L | -2.9wins | -0.14per pick | 52cpaid | -29.3%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x4e61…0e06backed Yes | 23c | 150$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$34.5 | 489 | 22.9%112 W · 377 L | -3.5wins | -0.01per pick | 24cpaid | -17.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb1a7…f2b7backed Yes | 37c | 96.15$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35.65 | 85 | 40%34 W · 51 L | +1.8wins | +0.02per pick | 38cpaid | +3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed No | 50c | 76.45$38 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$38.22 | 2,611 | 54.2%1,415 W · 1,196 L | +25.5wins | +0.01per pick | 53cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf02f…1ed8backed No | 78c | 72.04$56 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.85 | 507 | 46.7%237 W · 270 L | -5.8wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -4.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0cc5…ee5abacked Yes | 49c | 49.2$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$24.24 | 181 | 40.3%73 W · 108 L | +4.1wins | +0.02per pick | 38cpaid | +8.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x354f…95f8backed No | 78c | 48.07$37 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.58 | 9 | 66.7%6 W · 3 L | +0.8wins | +0.09per pick | 57cpaid | +8.4%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa64f…e598backed No | 78c | 38.49$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.47 | 72 | 65.3%47 W · 25 L | -0.7wins | -0.01per pick | 66cpaid | -1.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4471…3f7bbacked No | 53c | 34.25$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.1 | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.5wins | +0.47per pick | 53cpaid | +88.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x36f9…5445backed No | 79c | 31.25$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.56 | 172 | 61%105 W · 67 L | +4.8wins | +0.03per pick | 58cpaid | +3.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2119…9303backed Yes | 49c | 29.53$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.54 | 55 | 58.2%32 W · 23 L | +1.2wins | +0.02per pick | 56cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1521…ae21backed No | 51c | 29.41$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.41 | 28 | 75%21 W · 7 L | +6.0wins | +0.22per pick | 53cpaid | +37.5%equal weight | 63+0.11 edge/pick |
| 0x6134…c8ccbacked Yes | 50c | 29.1$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.55 | 95 | 47.4%45 W · 50 L | -3.0wins | -0.03per pick | 50cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe697…708fbacked No | 78c | 25.3$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.57 | 258 | 64.3%166 W · 92 L | +8.1wins | +0.03per pick | 61cpaid | +5.3%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xadfb…c2efbacked No | 50c | 25$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.5 | 1,668 | 51.7%863 W · 805 L | +18.0wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +5.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa1c4…487bbacked No | 79c | 19.9$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.18 | 4 | 75%3 W · 1 L | +0.4wins | +0.10per pick | 65cpaid | +5%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x22da…2866backed No | 77c | 14.36$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3.3 | 630 | 61.3%386 W · 244 L | +22.3wins | +0.04per pick | 58cpaid | +4.1%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- CA Banfield vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- CA Banfield vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: O/U 1.5Under won
- CA Banfield vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: O/U 2.5Under won
- CA Banfield vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: O/U 3.5Under won
- CA Banfield vs. CS Independiente Rivadavia: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: CA Banfield (-1.5)CS Independiente Rivadavia won
- Spread: CS Independiente Rivadavia (-1.5)CA Banfield won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.