Cricket · resolved market
Shpageeza Cricket League: Amo Sharks vs Band-e-Amir Dragons
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa4c2f575dd5060d43a4ac718c2d236f83ad9aa92cfe2df407a81a658b83dae60
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Amo Sharksof Amo Sharks, Band-e-Amir Dragons
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Cricketevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,225
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,869
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,225 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Cricket is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Cricket | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x8d99…9675backed Band-e-Amir Dragons | 37c | 2,512$925 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$924.76 | 71 | 31%22 W · 49 L | +0.8wins | +0.01per pick | 30cpaid | +25.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Amo Sharks | 64c | 1,666$1,061 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$605.31 | 423 | 44.2%187 W · 236 L | +0.8wins | 0.00per pick | 44cpaid | -12.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa2cd…820fbacked Amo Sharks | 76c | 420.74$321 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$99.38 | 187 | 29.4%55 W · 132 L | -1.8wins | -0.01per pick | 30cpaid | +0.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbee8…d0f0backed Band-e-Amir Dragons | 25c | 391.97$98 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$98 | 27 | 7.4%2 W · 25 L | -2.5wins | -0.09per pick | 17cpaid | -70.4%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Amo Sharks | 61c | 372.22$228 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$144 | 636 | 46.4%295 W · 341 L | +14.7wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x97e5…d1f0backed Band-e-Amir Dragons | 29c | 224.98$65 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$64.99 | 127 | 37.8%48 W · 79 L | +0.5wins | 0.00per pick | 37cpaid | -9.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5929…4684backed Amo Sharks | 63c | 198.49$125 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$73.56 | 419 | 47.5%199 W · 220 L | -3.1wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x972b…78babacked Amo Sharks | 79c | 123.15$97 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26.26 | 763 | 51.6%394 W · 369 L | +29.9wins | +0.04per pick | 48cpaid | -7.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xf66e…14b7backed Amo Sharks | 63c | 110.48$70 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$40.39 | 77 | 59.7%46 W · 31 L | +1.9wins | +0.02per pick | 57cpaid | -5.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6c54…da75backed Amo Sharks | 80c | 69.39$56 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.88 | 109 | 53.2%58 W · 51 L | +3.7wins | +0.03per pick | 50cpaid | +10.9%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x7a5d…54dbbacked Amo Sharks | 63c | 54.06$34 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.21 | 569 | 37.1%211 W · 358 L | -2.7wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -20.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x349e…867bbacked Amo Sharks | 65c | 52.22$34 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.03 | 78 | 56.4%44 W · 34 L | +5.7wins | +0.07per pick | 49cpaid | +9.7%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xe5b1…30b2backed Amo Sharks | 63c | 42$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.54 | 30 | 56.7%17 W · 13 L | +1.1wins | +0.04per pick | 53cpaid | +4.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x14f3…0796backed Amo Sharks | 67c | 41.4$28 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.76 | 122 | 50.8%62 W · 60 L | +1.8wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -11.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa57e…5e2abacked Amo Sharks | 60c | 35$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14 | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.4wins | +0.40per pick | 60cpaid | +66.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2bf3…4f00backed Amo Sharks | 73c | 28.24$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.65 | 65 | 63.1%41 W · 24 L | +2.0wins | +0.03per pick | 60cpaid | -6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x85c0…d9cfbacked Amo Sharks | 56c | 26.63$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.63 | 228 | 43.9%100 W · 128 L | -4.9wins | -0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -3.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc593…ea8cbacked Amo Sharks | 68c | 20$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.5 | 42 | 64.3%27 W · 15 L | +2.9wins | +0.07per pick | 57cpaid | +6.8%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x189e…5aaebacked Amo Sharks | 70c | 20$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6 | 38 | 52.6%20 W · 18 L | +1.9wins | +0.05per pick | 48cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5987…e287backed Amo Sharks | 53c | 19$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.93 | 109 | 48.6%53 W · 56 L | +5.3wins | +0.05per pick | 44cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Cricket and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.