MLB · resolved market
MIN Twins vs. STL Cardinals March 29
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa889add0a60db0a4d38197fff5437fe354bb020d2c9dc49dfd41010acc7ad8f0
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Cardinalsof Twins, Cardinals
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $20,291
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $27,519
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $20,291 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 14 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in MLB | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x7239…6591backed Cardinals | 51c | 8,262$4,213 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4,048.15 | 50 | 40%20 W · 30 L | -5.2wins | -0.10per pick | 50cpaid | -19.9%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x2fe6…ab9dbacked Twins | 49c | 8,182$4,009 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$4,008.95 | 237 | 52.7%125 W · 112 L | +7.6wins | +0.03per pick | 50cpaid | +5.2%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1d3a…7b63backed Cardinals | 48c | 325$156 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$169 | 1,352 | 50.8%687 W · 665 L | +13.3wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | +2.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8b7e…6a9fbacked Twins | 52c | 192.31$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 2,033 | 52.4%1,066 W · 967 L | -35.5wins | -0.02per pick | 54cpaid | -3.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x29c0…efaabacked Twins | 52c | 172.39$90 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$89.64 | 1,212 | 52.1%631 W · 581 L | +21.3wins | +0.02per pick | 50cpaid | +3.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2fd3…7214backed Twins | 18c | 130$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.25 | 50 | 26%13 W · 37 L | -3.6wins | -0.07per pick | 33cpaid | -40.5%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xc8b4…f05dbacked Twins | 50c | 123.07$62 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$61.54 | 418 | 50%209 W · 209 L | +6.4wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +2.4%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7c85…77c6backed Cardinals | 57c | 108.07$62 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$46.47 | 927 | 54.9%509 W · 418 L | -19.1wins | -0.02per pick | 57cpaid | -4.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdc4b…5a92backed Twins | 54c | 92.59$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 2,267 | 53.3%1,208 W · 1,059 L | -12.4wins | -0.01per pick | 54cpaid | -1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb786…b18dbacked Cardinals | 47c | 76.14$36 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$40.08 | 1,591 | 50.3%801 W · 790 L | +68.9wins | +0.04per pick | 46cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0643…d46bbacked Cardinals | 48c | 51.97$25 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26.97 | 405 | 57.8%234 W · 171 L | +7.6wins | +0.02per pick | 56cpaid | +3.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa337…9e54backed Twins | 54c | 46.3$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 944 | 55.3%522 W · 422 L | -2.9wins | 0.00per pick | 56cpaid | -0.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5220…4e88backed Twins | 52c | 38.46$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 50 | 42%21 W · 29 L | -4.6wins | -0.09per pick | 51cpaid | -24.4%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x3dd4…1b50backed Cardinals | 48c | 20.9$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.87 | 2,045 | 53.8%1,100 W · 945 L | +32.7wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 15 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- MIN Twins vs. STL Cardinals March 29this page
- ATL Braves vs. SD Padres March 29Padres won
- BAL Orioles vs. TOR Blue Jays March 29Orioles won
- BOS Red Sox vs. TEX Rangers March 29Rangers won
- CHC Cubs vs. ARI Diamondbacks March 29Cubs won
- CLE Guardians vs. KC Royals March 29Royals won
- COL Rockies vs. TB Rays March 29Rockies won
- DET Tigers vs. LAD Dodgers March 29Dodgers won
- LAA Angels vs. CWS White Sox March 29Angels won
- MIL Brewers vs. NYY Yankees March 29Yankees won
- NYM Mets vs. HOU Astros March 29Astros won
- OAK Athletics vs. SEA Mariners March 29Athletics won
- PHI Phillies vs. WSH Nationals March 29Philies won
- PIT Pirates vs. MIA Marlins March 29Marlins won
- SF Giants vs. CIN Reds March 29Reds won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.