Tennis · resolved market
ITF Monastir: Amir Omarkhanov vs Charles Bertimon
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xad5f6a9b91358cecfa3e08de668aa86149597d515d1cef0e2f93880a71d8ab8d
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Charles Bertimonof Amir Omarkhanov, Charles Bertimon
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $9,089
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $9,301
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $9,089 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Charles Bertimon | 62c | 7,274$4,495 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$2,779.34 | 11,435 | 43.4%4,959 W · 6,476 L | +17.8wins | 0.00per pick | 43cpaid | -20.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Amir Omarkhanov | 47c | 4,691$2,222 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$2,222.29 | 6,439 | 54.4%3,502 W · 2,937 L | +285.2wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +26.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x99d7…6435backed Amir Omarkhanov | 23c | 2,788$642 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$641.72 | 1,148 | 53%608 W · 540 L | +25.5wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | +22.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Charles Bertimon | 62c | 719.91$446 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$274.12 | 8,505 | 42.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L | -166.3wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb71e…641abacked Amir Omarkhanov | 8c | 240$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.06 | 337 | 51.9%175 W · 162 L | +11.6wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +7.1%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xb6fc…b24ebacked Amir Omarkhanov | 24c | 123$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.52 | 1,417 | 45.2%640 W · 777 L | +41.7wins | +0.03per pick | 42cpaid | +8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x85c3…700cbacked Amir Omarkhanov | 36c | 118.64$43 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42.71 | 1,688 | 45.4%766 W · 922 L | -10.5wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -1.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6701…d7d2backed Amir Omarkhanov | 47c | 106$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$49.82 | 561 | 53.7%301 W · 260 L | +14.4wins | +0.03per pick | 51cpaid | +3%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Amir Omarkhanov | 21c | 104.81$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.86 | 7,816 | 50.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L | +95.4wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf1f2…8c8dbacked Charles Bertimon | 68c | 99.99$68 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.67 | 1,708 | 44.8%766 W · 942 L | -18.9wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -22.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdc0c…47eabacked Amir Omarkhanov | 38c | 83.18$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31.78 | 24 | 62.5%15 W · 9 L | +3.2wins | +0.13per pick | 49cpaid | +42.8%equal weight | 57+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x5663…f2e5backed Amir Omarkhanov | 48c | 74.08$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35.56 | 349 | 57.9%202 W · 147 L | +16.5wins | +0.05per pick | 53cpaid | +8.2%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x4eef…5275backed Charles Bertimon | 79c | 63.31$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.29 | 363 | 78.2%284 W · 79 L | +5.1wins | +0.01per pick | 77cpaid | +2.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe83a…8355backed Amir Omarkhanov | 44c | 56.82$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 652 | 59.4%387 W · 265 L | +31.5wins | +0.05per pick | 55cpaid | +6.2%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xac1a…8689backed Amir Omarkhanov | 47c | 41$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.27 | 275 | 50.2%138 W · 137 L | -4.8wins | -0.02per pick | 52cpaid | -7.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x42a1…a8e9backed Charles Bertimon | 74c | 39.57$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.14 | 394 | 51.3%202 W · 192 L | -3.9wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -9.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x03bf…24b9backed Charles Bertimon | 77c | 28.77$22 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.69 | 132 | 76.5%101 W · 31 L | +13.9wins | +0.11per pick | 66cpaid | +16.1%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.