Wallet 0x0f76…dcc9
https://tailmypicks.com/w/0x0f76e9a901b9b18b0ac0561556079aa4f0a6dcc9
Rebuilt .
What this wallet holds right now
Last asked . We read the wallets we follow in rotation; the one we have gone longest without asking about was asked .
- Positions on running markets
- 13
- What they are worth now
- $867
- Settled, not yet cashed
- 18
bought for $872
worth $0
Its 10 largest running positions
Of 13, by what they are worth today. The count and the value in the tiles above cover all of them.
| Market | Position | Paid | Now | Worth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US Open, Qualification WTA: Sofia Costoulas vs Jennifer Ruggeribacked Sofia Costoulas | 245shares | 93c | 97c | $238 |
| US Open, Qualification ATP: Luca Nardi vs Federico Cinabacked Federico Cina | 220.8shares | 83c | 100c | $221 |
| Monterrey Open: Cristina Bucsa vs Anna Bondarbacked Cristina Bucsa | 134.6shares | 91c | 100c | $135 |
| Monterrey Open: Darja Vidmanova vs Kimberly Birrellbacked Darja Vidmanova | 117shares | 76c | 81c | $94 |
| Tampa Bay Rays vs. Detroit Tigersbacked Detroit Tigers | 120shares | 46c | 51c | $61 |
| US Open, Qualification ATP: Yunchaokete Bu vs Rio Noguchibacked Rio Noguchi | 125shares | 60c | 41c | $51 |
| Monterrey Open: Darja Vidmanova vs Kimberly Birrellbacked Kimberly Birrell | 117.85shares | 54c | 20c | $23 |
| US Open, Qualification ATP: Yunchaokete Bu vs Rio Noguchibacked Yunchaokete Bu | 37.02shares | 48c | 60c | $22 |
| ITF W35 Trieste Women: Matilde Paoletti vs Sophie Triquartbacked Sophie Triquart | 30shares | 23c | 41c | $12 |
| Winston-Salem Open: James Duckworth vs Mariano Navonebacked James Duckworth | 9shares | 62c | 60c | $5 |
Paid is Polymarket’s own average price over what the wallet still holds — it is not the entry price TailMyPicks derives for a scored pick, which is the volume-weighted average of the buys on the side it picked. Now is what the same outcome costs on Polymarket as of the last catalogue refresh. Nothing on this table is a result: these markets have not resolved and there is nothing yet to be right about.
Settled bets it has not cashed in
The 5 largest of 18. These are markets that have already resolved: the money is sitting there and the wallet has not collected it. They are not open convictions, which is why they are not in the figures above.
| Market | Position | Paid | Worth | In the record? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market 0xc99b…94f7backed outcome 0 | 449.69shares | 6c | $0 | Not ingested |
| Market 0xf38c…302bbacked outcome 1 | 257.2shares | 7c | $0 | Not ingested |
| Roehampton 2: Ivan Ivanov vs Ryan Penistonbacked Ryan Peniston · resolved | 226.05shares | 75c | $0 | Counted |
| Boston Red Sox vs. Miami Marlinsbacked Miami Marlins · resolved | 192.53shares | 4c | $0 | Counted |
| Roehampton 2: Inaki Montes-De La Torre vs Oskari Paldaniusbacked Oskari Paldanius · resolved | 159.17shares | 26c | $0 | Never scored |
Do these count towards the record above? 2 do — the wallet holds a scored pick on those markets, already in the table below. 1 never will: TailMyPicks scored that market and this wallet’s position on it did not clear the bar — too small, or bought above the price cap, or hedged away. 2 are not in the published record at all — TailMyPicks has published nothing about those markets, so they are neither counted nor ruled out. Either it has yet to be ingested, or nothing anybody held on it was ever scored.
These figures and the record below never add up. What this wallet is holding on Polymarket right now and what TailMyPicks has scored it on are two different sets of markets, measured in different ways — the record covers markets that have already resolved and been graded, these figures cover money that is still on the table. No number on this page combines them, and adding one to the other would mean nothing.
Summary
- Qualified picks
- 2,051
- Categories scored
- 18
- Categories below 50
- 7
Best Category: NFL, grading 63 out of 100 (+0.11 per pick).
Best Category NFL at 63 out of 100; worst Lol at 45.
What is a Tail Score?
A mark out of 100, per Category. 50 means no edge at all — this wallet did about what the prices it paid implied it would. Above 50 it beat those prices; below 50 it did worse than them.
The scale does not move. 100 is a wallet beating the prices it paid by 0.45 per pick and 0 is losing to them by the same, on every wallet, on every page, in every month. So a grade you screenshot today still means what it meant when you took it, and two wallets can be put side by side.
Nobody reaches either end. Across every wallet TailMyPicks has scored, the marks run from roughly 5 to 87 — which is what a fixed ruler costs, and what buys the sentence above.
It is not a win rate. A wallet can win four Picks in five and still grade below 50, if the market was already pricing those outcomes at 90c — it paid for the wins rather than finding them. The vs expected and Avg entry columns below are what separate the two.
The mark is deliberately pulled toward 50 when there is little evidence. Three lucky Picks do not produce a high grade; several hundred consistent ones do. So a modest grade on thousands of Picks means something a high grade on twelve does not.
Because it is shrunk this way, a Category grade is a conservative reading. The headline figure for a wallet is its best Category, so it always understates how badly the wallet does in its worst one — which is why the table below is per Category and not one blended number.
Record by Category
Ordered by how much this wallet actually traded in each Category, not by score — so the Categories it plays most appear first whether they went well or badly.
The individual picks are not listed for this wallet. It holds 2,051 qualified picks — more than the 2,000 this page can detail on the request path. The record below is the summary of every one of them, and the JSON endpoint carries the same per-Category figures.
| Category | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tennislast resolved Aug 25, 2026, EDT | 874 | 50.6%442 W · 432 L | +20.7wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -13.7%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| MLBlast resolved Aug 25, 2026, EDT | 851 | 48.5%413 W · 438 L | +10.6wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -15.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| WNBAlast resolved Aug 23, 2026, EDT | 118 | 41.5%49 W · 69 L | +0.6wins | 0.00per pick | 41cpaid | -18.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| Cricketlast resolved Aug 23, 2026, EDT | 55 | 49.1%27 W · 28 L | +3.4wins | +0.06per pick | 43cpaid | -7.8%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| UFClast resolved Aug 22, 2026, EDT | 46 | 43.5%20 W · 26 L | +1.8wins | +0.04per pick | 40cpaid | -19.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| NBA Inactivelast resolved Jul 19, 2026, EDT | 41 | 36.6%15 W · 26 L | -1.5wins | -0.04per pick | 40cpaid | -13.8%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| NFLlast resolved Aug 23, 2026, EDT | 25 | 72%18 W · 7 L | +5.7wins | +0.23per pick | 49cpaid | +40.6%equal weight | 63+0.11 edge/pick |
| Ncaa Basketball Inactivelast resolved Mar 28, 2026, EDT | 10 | 10%1 W · 9 L | -1.3wins | -0.13per pick | 23cpaid | -82%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| Lol Inactivelast resolved Aug 1, 2026, EDT | 10 | 30%3 W · 7 L | -1.4wins | -0.14per pick | 44cpaid | -42.5%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| Valorant Inactivelast resolved Aug 2, 2026, EDT | 8 | 50%4 W · 4 L | 0.0wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -7.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| NHL Inactivelast resolved Jun 11, 2026, EDT | 6 | 33.3%2 W · 4 L | -0.8wins | -0.13per pick | 47cpaid | -39.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| Macro Indicators Inactivelast resolved Dec 16, 2025, EST | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.7wins | +0.69per pick | 31cpaid | +225.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| Commodities Inactivelast resolved Jun 2, 2026, EDT | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.7wins | +0.69per pick | 31cpaid | +218.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| Middle East Inactivelast resolved Mar 8, 2026, EDT | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.4wins | +0.43per pick | 57cpaid | +76.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| Us Politics Inactivelast resolved Dec 19, 2025, EST | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.3wins | +0.33per pick | 67cpaid | +49.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| Fed Rates Inactivelast resolved Dec 10, 2025, EST | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.1wins | -0.13per pick | 13cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| Ukraine Inactivelast resolved Jan 1, 2026, EST | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.2wins | -0.16per pick | 16cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| Venezuela Inactivelast resolved Jan 1, 2026, EST | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.2wins | -0.18per pick | 18cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
vs expected is how many more (or fewer) Picks this wallet won than the prices it paid implied it would. It is the column that tells a real edge apart from a record bought by backing favourites. Realizable edge is what that comes to per Pick for somebody copying the wallet, after the cost of getting in behind it. Avg entry is the average price it paid, so a strong record built on heavy favourites shows as one. ROI per pick counts every Pick equally rather than by size, which is how a record earned across many Picks is told apart from one carried by a few large ones. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in — an American night game settles after midnight UTC, so any other zone would name the day after the one it was played on. Inactive means nothing has resolved in that Category recently. The score is kept and the wallet stays reachable here; it only leaves the default leaderboard.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.