TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Wallet 0x48ed…f0e2

Rebuilt .

Summary

Qualified picks
17
Categories scored
2
Categories below 50
1

Best Category: Cricket, grading 52 out of 100 (+0.02 per pick).

Best Category Cricket at 52 out of 100; worst Tennis at 46.

What is a Tail Score?

A mark out of 100, per Category. 50 means no edge at all — this wallet did about what the prices it paid implied it would. Above 50 it beat those prices; below 50 it did worse than them.

The scale does not move. 100 is a wallet beating the prices it paid by 0.45 per pick and 0 is losing to them by the same, on every wallet, on every page, in every month. So a grade you screenshot today still means what it meant when you took it, and two wallets can be put side by side.

Nobody reaches either end. Across every wallet TailMyPicks has scored, the marks run from roughly 5 to 87 — which is what a fixed ruler costs, and what buys the sentence above.

It is not a win rate. A wallet can win four Picks in five and still grade below 50, if the market was already pricing those outcomes at 90c — it paid for the wins rather than finding them. The vs expected and Avg entry columns below are what separate the two.

The mark is deliberately pulled toward 50 when there is little evidence. Three lucky Picks do not produce a high grade; several hundred consistent ones do. So a modest grade on thousands of Picks means something a high grade on twelve does not.

Because it is shrunk this way, a Category grade is a conservative reading. The headline figure for a wallet is its best Category, so it always understates how badly the wallet does in its worst one — which is why the table below is per Category and not one blended number.

Record by Category

Ordered by how much this wallet actually traded in each Category, not by score — so the Categories it plays most appear first whether they went well or badly. Open any row to see the picks its numbers were computed from — all of them.

CategoryQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
Tennis Inactivelast resolved Jul 6, 2026, EDT1560%9 W · 6 L-1.5wins-0.10per pick70cpaid-14.1%equal weight46-0.04 edge/pick
Tennis — the 15 picks behind this row

Every qualified pick this wallet made in Tennis, newest first — these are the picks the row above was computed from, not a sample of them. P/L held is what each pick would have been worth held to resolution, not cash this wallet withdrew. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in. A market name opens TailMyPicks’s own post-mortem of that market — who else was on it, and what they paid — and a result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody.

MarketEntrySizeResultResolvedReturnP/L held
Wimbledon WTA (Doubles): Danilina/Krunic vs Neel/Olmosbacked Danilina/Krunic · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)70c$2,072Lost — open this pick on its own pageJul 6, 2026, EDT-100%-$2,072.36
Wimbledon ATP: Alex de Minaur vs Flavio Cobollibacked Alex de Minaur · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)74c$6,200Lost — open this pick on its own pageJul 6, 2026, EDT-100%-$6,200.41
Wimbledon ATP: Roman Safiullin vs Joao Fonsecabacked Roman Safiullin · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)77c$3,080Won — open this pick on its own pageJul 3, 2026, EDT+29.9%+$920
Wimbledon ATP: Hubert Hurkacz vs Sebastian Ofnerbacked Hubert Hurkacz · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)76c$8,754Won — open this pick on its own pageJul 1, 2026, EDT+32.3%+$2,827.39
Wimbledon ATP: Lorenzo Sonego vs Tomas Etcheverrybacked Lorenzo Sonego · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)71c$3,550Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 30, 2026, EDT+40.8%+$1,450
Wimbledon ATP: Arthur Rinderknech vs Oliver Tarvetbacked Arthur Rinderknech · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)74c$1,992Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 29, 2026, EDT+35.5%+$708
Wimbledon ATP: Andrey Rublev vs Roman Safiullinbacked Andrey Rublev · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)71c$4,962Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 29, 2026, EDT-100%-$4,962.06
Dublin: Oliver Crawford vs Daniil Glinkabacked Daniil Glinka · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)72c$1,121Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 16, 2026, EDT-100%-$1,121.2
Grass Court Championships: Nikola Bartunkova vs Diana Shnaiderbacked Nikola Bartunkova · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)66c$330Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 15, 2026, EDT+51.5%+$170
Roland Garros ATP: Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Flavio Cobollibacked Felix Auger-Aliassime · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)47c$1,212Lost — open this pick on its own pageJun 3, 2026, EDT-100%-$1,212.44
Prostejov: Alexander Shevchenko vs Raul Brancacciobacked Alexander Shevchenko · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)76c$873Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 1, 2026, EDT+31.6%+$275.6
Roland Garros ATP: Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Matteo Berrettinibacked Matteo Berrettini · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)71c$623Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 1, 2026, EDT+40.8%+$254.41
Roland Garros WTA: Maja Chwalinska vs Diane Parrybacked Maja Chwalinska · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)60c$333Won — open this pick on its own pageJun 1, 2026, EDT+66.7%+$222.31
Roland Garros WTA: Maria Sakkari vs Maja Chwalinskabacked Maria Sakkari · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)80c$3,704Lost — open this pick on its own pageMay 30, 2026, EDT-100%-$3,703.72
Roland Garros ATP: Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Andrey Rublevbacked Andrey Rublev · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)63c$1,983Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 27, 2026, EDT+58.7%+$1,164.9
All 15 picks, newest first.
Cricket Inactivelast resolved May 31, 2026, EDT2100%2 W · 0 L+0.6wins+0.29per pick71cpaid+42.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
Cricket — the 2 picks behind this row

Every qualified pick this wallet made in Cricket, newest first — these are the picks the row above was computed from, not a sample of them. P/L held is what each pick would have been worth held to resolution, not cash this wallet withdrew. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in. A market name opens TailMyPicks’s own post-mortem of that market — who else was on it, and what they paid — and a result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody.

MarketEntrySizeResultResolvedReturnP/L held
Indian Premier League: Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Gujarat Titansbacked Royal Challengers Bengaluru · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)78c$992Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 31, 2026, EDT+28.2%+$279.81
Indian Premier League: Sunrisers Hyderabad vs Rajasthan Royalsbacked Rajasthan Royals · on Polymarket (opens in a new tab)64c$2,287Won — open this pick on its own pageMay 27, 2026, EDT+56.3%+$1,286.66
All 2 picks, newest first.

vs expected is how many more (or fewer) Picks this wallet won than the prices it paid implied it would. It is the column that tells a real edge apart from a record bought by backing favourites. Realizable edge is what that comes to per Pick for somebody copying the wallet, after the cost of getting in behind it. Avg entry is the average price it paid, so a strong record built on heavy favourites shows as one. ROI per pick counts every Pick equally rather than by size, which is how a record earned across many Picks is told apart from one carried by a few large ones. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in — an American night game settles after midnight UTC, so any other zone would name the day after the one it was played on. Inactive means nothing has resolved in that Category recently. The score is kept and the wallet stays reachable here; it only leaves the default leaderboard.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.