La Liga · resolved market
RC Deportivo A Coruña vs. Elche CF: O/U 8.5 Total Corners
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x097f67f956686455f48611af83601e3888016f8fda3d114a7e3f5810bb43f7af
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- La Ligaevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,036
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,037
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,036 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 14 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in La Liga is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in La Liga | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x65b5…aa71backed Over | 51c | 510.2$260 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$260.2 | 70 | 57.1%40 W · 30 L | -2.3wins | -0.03per pick | 60cpaid | -5.3%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7d0c…a3b7backed Under | 47c | 429.16$201 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$228.56 | 1,081 | 50.6%547 W · 534 L | +11.7wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1f62…76f6backed Under | 47c | 372.22$176 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$196.35 | 1,045 | 47.8%500 W · 545 L | +15.1wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | +1%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfe5b…8abcbacked Under | 49c | 317.9$156 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$162.13 | 23 | 26.1%6 W · 17 L | -1.1wins | -0.05per pick | 31cpaid | -34.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa491…dbe8backed Over | 55c | 291$160 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$160.1 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.6wins | -0.55per pick | 55cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe0a1…a119backed Over | 52c | 288.46$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$150 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.5wins | -0.52per pick | 52cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd01c…7f9dbacked Under | 47c | 213$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$113.15 | 890 | 50%445 W · 445 L | +24.8wins | +0.03per pick | 47cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x7fe4…70c1backed Over | 53c | 200$106 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$106 | 13 | 38.5%5 W · 8 L | -1.0wins | -0.07per pick | 46cpaid | -13.5%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa6db…3155backed Under | 47c | 115.06$54 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$60.98 | 94 | 46.8%44 W · 50 L | -3.2wins | -0.03per pick | 50cpaid | -12.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xb47b…c6b1backed Over | 53c | 94.53$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 29 | 37.9%11 W · 18 L | -3.2wins | -0.11per pick | 49cpaid | -23.5%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x9e3e…f882backed Over | 53c | 30.53$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.18 | 205 | 33.7%69 W · 136 L | -1.2wins | -0.01per pick | 34cpaid | -1.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8728…0882backed Over | 54c | 20$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.8 | 26 | 53.8%14 W · 12 L | +0.6wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | +4.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3f97…1586backed Over | 54c | 20$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.8 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.8wins | -0.41per pick | 41cpaid | -100%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xadfb…c2efbacked Over | 50c | 20$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 492 | 52.6%259 W · 233 L | +13.9wins | +0.03per pick | 50cpaid | +4.9%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in La Liga and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 2 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- RC Deportivo A Coruña vs. Elche CF: O/U 8.5 Total Cornersthis page
- RC Deportivo A Coruña vs. Elche CF: O/U 7.5 Total CornersOver won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.