CS2 · resolved market
Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs OLDBOYS- - Map 1 Winner
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x0ebe5107cf98fa7460e970ba17fe69f9234234e0d186cd4bec6f15775592e2b0
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- OLDBOYS-of Rune Eaters, OLDBOYS-
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- CS2every record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $5,713
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $6,779
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $5,713 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in CS2 is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in CS2 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x0656…4d9bbacked Rune Eaters | 1c | 1,500$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 194 | 3.6%7 W · 187 L | -0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 4cpaid | -48.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa557…5e8abacked Rune Eaters | 1c | 1,000$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 197 | 3.6%7 W · 190 L | -1.3wins | -0.01per pick | 4cpaid | -91.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3123…b44dbacked OLDBOYS- | 59c | 634.99$374 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$261.08 | 193 | 52.3%101 W · 92 L | -2.2wins | -0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -9.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfdc0…4b85backed Rune Eaters | 41c | 500$205 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$205 | 2,092 | 41.6%871 W · 1,221 L | -50.8wins | -0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -16.5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0e1b…ecafbacked OLDBOYS- | 66c | 466.98$310 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$156.6 | 2,328 | 51.1%1,189 W · 1,139 L | +92.3wins | +0.04per pick | 47cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xca81…f2abbacked OLDBOYS- | 61c | 323.1$196 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$126.93 | 357 | 44.3%158 W · 199 L | -2.8wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Rune Eaters | 42c | 241.3$101 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$101.35 | 5,580 | 47.2%2,632 W · 2,948 L | +47.0wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -4.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9919…f261backed Rune Eaters | 40c | 239.34$96 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$96.45 | 418 | 47.1%197 W · 221 L | -7.2wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -7.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf9be…a0c1backed Rune Eaters | 31c | 218$68 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$68.43 | 447 | 48.1%215 W · 232 L | +17.3wins | +0.04per pick | 44cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8705…edbabacked Rune Eaters | 42c | 100$42 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42 | 401 | 40.6%163 W · 238 L | -10.0wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | +8.3%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x812a…73edbacked Rune Eaters | 39c | 94.76$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$37.26 | 483 | 19%92 W · 391 L | -65.4wins | -0.14per pick | 33cpaid | -46.4%equal weight | 36-0.13 edge/pick |
| 0x8120…a9f1backed Rune Eaters | 43c | 42.25$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17.96 | 81 | 51.9%42 W · 39 L | +1.4wins | +0.02per pick | 50cpaid | -5.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5929…4684backed Rune Eaters | 46c | 36.61$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.84 | 4,099 | 51%2,091 W · 2,008 L | +74.6wins | +0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb6d2…d67bbacked Rune Eaters | 32c | 34.11$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.08 | 1,315 | 51.1%672 W · 643 L | -99.5wins | -0.08per pick | 59cpaid | -18.5%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x29a5…a3c4backed OLDBOYS- | 61c | 30$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.7 | 1,003 | 55.7%559 W · 444 L | +24.5wins | +0.02per pick | 53cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in CS2 and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 4 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs OLDBOYS- - Map 1 Winnerthis page
- Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs OLDBOYS- (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Europe Cup #4 PlayoffsOLDBOYS- won
- Counter-Strike: Rune Eaters vs OLDBOYS- - Map 2 WinnerOLDBOYS- won
- Map Handicap: OLDBOYS- (-1.5) vs Rune Eaters (+1.5)OLDBOYS- won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.