Tennis · resolved market
ITF Nottingham: Emily Appleton vs Lauryn John-Baptiste
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x1d0242b88c80808842495b9632d7b809e73aeb8a9437b7092e064aab030bbb69
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Emily Appletonof Emily Appleton, Lauryn John-Baptiste
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $12,112
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $12,145
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $12,112 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 20 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Lauryn John-Baptiste | 1c | 10,134$105 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$105.29 | 11,666 | 43.4%5,059 W · 6,607 L | +22.2wins | 0.00per pick | 43cpaid | -20%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x6318…46b1backed Lauryn John-Baptiste | 36c | 917.57$330 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$330.23 | 5,325 | 28.8%1,533 W · 3,792 L | -21.8wins | 0.00per pick | 29cpaid | -2.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xefa3…7585backed Emily Appleton | 65c | 307.69$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$107.69 | 101 | 58.4%59 W · 42 L | +3.5wins | +0.03per pick | 55cpaid | +9%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x03c5…5f61backed Emily Appleton | 63c | 279.68$176 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$103.48 | 20 | 60%12 W · 8 L | +3.7wins | +0.18per pick | 42cpaid | +56.3%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xc07d…b1dfbacked Emily Appleton | 71c | 211.01$149 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$61.6 | 2,383 | 55.6%1,326 W · 1,057 L | +49.3wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | -5.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0009…5497backed Lauryn John-Baptiste | 29c | 172.17$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$49.93 | 1,880 | 48.5%912 W · 968 L | +8.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0x747f…f2d7backed Emily Appleton | 63c | 158.72$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$58.73 | 901 | 52.3%471 W · 430 L | -2.6wins | 0.00per pick | 53cpaid | -1.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8bf9…8292backed Emily Appleton | 64c | 94.91$61 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$34.17 | 591 | 57.7%341 W · 250 L | +20.9wins | +0.04per pick | 54cpaid | +8.2%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5929…4684backed Lauryn John-Baptiste | 36c | 88.5$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31.86 | 3,798 | 54.9%2,087 W · 1,711 L | +111.3wins | +0.03per pick | 52cpaid | -1.3%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5210…bd53backed Lauryn John-Baptiste | 38c | 79.99$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30.39 | 3,987 | 45.5%1,816 W · 2,171 L | -34.0wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -2.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdd1e…4754backed Lauryn John-Baptiste | 29c | 65.58$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.34 | 441 | 44.7%197 W · 244 L | +7.2wins | +0.02per pick | 43cpaid | +3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xae8e…08f9backed Emily Appleton | 62c | 62.4$39 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23.71 | 116 | 53.4%62 W · 54 L | +1.5wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | +3.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8920…9c0cbacked Emily Appleton | 73c | 52.2$38 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.13 | 293 | 47.4%139 W · 154 L | -7.9wins | -0.03per pick | 50cpaid | -18.5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1c66…e371backed Emily Appleton | 65c | 32$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.2 | 305 | 54.4%166 W · 139 L | -1.0wins | 0.00per pick | 55cpaid | +2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2acd…d0b6backed Emily Appleton | 65c | 30.77$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.77 | 141 | 53.2%75 W · 66 L | +1.1wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x51eb…6bfabacked Emily Appleton | 65c | 29.45$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.31 | 2,561 | 63%1,613 W · 948 L | -10.2wins | 0.00per pick | 63cpaid | -0.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x522f…1164backed Lauryn John-Baptiste | 37c | 27.99$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.36 | 304 | 36.8%112 W · 192 L | -19.6wins | -0.06per pick | 43cpaid | -11.2%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x53c9…234dbacked Emily Appleton | 65c | 25$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.75 | 86 | 58.1%50 W · 36 L | -1.2wins | -0.01per pick | 60cpaid | -4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6d10…b3d0backed Emily Appleton | 62c | 20$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.6 | 826 | 59.3%490 W · 336 L | +3.3wins | 0.00per pick | 59cpaid | 0%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3b46…ed0dbacked Emily Appleton | 63c | 20$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$7.4 | 324 | 52.5%170 W · 154 L | -15.3wins | -0.05per pick | 57cpaid | -11%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.