Tennis · resolved market
ITF Southaven: Clement Chidekh vs Timo Legout
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x1f29ea899a47397a848b3676205cdb3e490c52f2689fa3221378e128f0dc3092
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Timo Legoutof Clement Chidekh, Timo Legout
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $10,267
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $13,416
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $10,267 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 23 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xf8fe…359dbacked Clement Chidekh | 21c | 1,000$212 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$212 | 106 | 32.1%34 W · 72 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 32cpaid | -19%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x02f0…9bb3backed Clement Chidekh | 13c | 870$113 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$113.1 | 171 | 36.3%62 W · 109 L | +2.9wins | +0.02per pick | 35cpaid | -18.1%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf068…849cbacked Timo Legout | 44c | 680.27$300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$380.27 | 64 | 57.8%37 W · 27 L | +1.7wins | +0.03per pick | 55cpaid | +6.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x8421…4e30backed Clement Chidekh | 14c | 600$84 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$84 | 80 | 27.5%22 W · 58 L | -2.5wins | -0.03per pick | 31cpaid | -22.2%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7a3d…4d49backed Clement Chidekh | 57c | 526$300 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$299.82 | 255 | 46.7%119 W · 136 L | -11.8wins | -0.05per pick | 51cpaid | -4.7%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x25f7…b16dbacked Timo Legout | 61c | 459.02$280 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$179.02 | 281 | 54.8%154 W · 127 L | -4.5wins | -0.02per pick | 56cpaid | -4.8%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc1d7…47a4backed Timo Legout | 45c | 426.67$192 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$234.67 | 1,023 | 41.3%422 W · 601 L | -24.8wins | -0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Clement Chidekh | 60c | 323.4$196 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$195.54 | 4,241 | 52.6%2,232 W · 2,009 L | +65.0wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -1.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf0b3…145dbacked Timo Legout | 43c | 302.33$130 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$172.33 | 917 | 54%495 W · 422 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 54cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x4ffd…7821backed Clement Chidekh | 52c | 297.07$154 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$154.49 | 559 | 41.9%234 W · 325 L | -27.0wins | -0.05per pick | 47cpaid | -21.2%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x13f7…85d5backed Clement Chidekh | 56c | 288.78$162 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$161.77 | 1,308 | 38.9%509 W · 799 L | -23.3wins | -0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -27.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Clement Chidekh | 55c | 229.89$127 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$127.35 | 6,449 | 46.3%2,987 W · 3,462 L | -42.9wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -13%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Clement Chidekh | 57c | 184.94$105 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$104.57 | 8,505 | 42.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L | -166.3wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2cb2…ee14backed Timo Legout | 46c | 144.91$67 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$77.89 | 83 | 56.6%47 W · 36 L | +1.0wins | +0.01per pick | 55cpaid | -1.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa8f5…5e63backed Clement Chidekh | 15c | 134.91$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.15 | 46 | 15.2%7 W · 39 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 15cpaid | -40.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0b2a…0a73backed Timo Legout | 41c | 121.95$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$71.95 | 940 | 58.4%549 W · 391 L | +21.5wins | +0.02per pick | 56cpaid | +4.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Timo Legout | 43c | 117.66$51 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$66.54 | 11,435 | 43.4%4,959 W · 6,476 L | +17.8wins | 0.00per pick | 43cpaid | -20.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3cad…92f0backed Clement Chidekh | 54c | 83.33$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$45 | 3,220 | 40.5%1,305 W · 1,915 L | +28.3wins | +0.01per pick | 40cpaid | +2.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7179…7d79backed Clement Chidekh | 54c | 74.07$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 2,601 | 46.5%1,209 W · 1,392 L | +18.8wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xefbc…b344backed Clement Chidekh | 55c | 40.91$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.5 | 301 | 47.5%143 W · 158 L | -1.8wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -6.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe1e3…f1bdbacked Timo Legout | 53c | 25$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.75 | 883 | 58.2%514 W · 369 L | +12.9wins | +0.01per pick | 57cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3ca9…424abacked Clement Chidekh | 57c | 23.27$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.26 | 1,710 | 53.7%918 W · 792 L | +30.7wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | -8.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb663…f135backed Clement Chidekh | 50c | 21.8$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.9 | 563 | 37.3%210 W · 353 L | -0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 37cpaid | +1.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.