Tennis · resolved market
Libema Open (Doubles): Balaji/Ram vs Bergs/Rinderknech
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x25754322c658b3a9b75206e3db1696d32be74064e0dc5f11be6655b5a2d87ae2
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Bergs/Rinderknechof Balaji/Ram, Bergs/Rinderknech
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,274
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,314
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,274 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x168a…da29backed Balaji/Ram | 21c | 207.98$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$43.67 | 88 | 54.5%48 W · 40 L | -1.3wins | -0.01per pick | 56cpaid | -8.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x98db…dd17backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 70c | 120.75$84 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$36.64 | 5,350 | 56.4%3,016 W · 2,334 L | +228.4wins | +0.04per pick | 52cpaid | -6.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0c88…5463backed Balaji/Ram | 62c | 81.01$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 17 | 41.2%7 W · 10 L | -2.4wins | -0.14per pick | 56cpaid | -28.5%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x72aa…90e0backed Balaji/Ram | 29c | 70$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.65 | 432 | 50.5%218 W · 214 L | +3.9wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -6.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5a13…e456backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 80c | 62.5$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.5 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | -0.6wins | -0.30per pick | 80cpaid | -37.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc7c7…3b08backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 80c | 62.5$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$12.5 | 509 | 58%295 W · 214 L | -26.5wins | -0.05per pick | 63cpaid | -7.9%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xc2be…af12backed Balaji/Ram | 25c | 49.79$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.45 | 2,032 | 46.9%952 W · 1,080 L | -12.4wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -7.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0009…5497backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 42c | 47.95$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.81 | 1,880 | 48.5%912 W · 968 L | +8.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Bergs/Rinderknech | 42c | 47.51$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.56 | 7,816 | 50.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L | +95.4wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x645a…b910backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 80c | 40$32 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8 | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.2wins | +0.20per pick | 80cpaid | +25%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd034…eecebacked Bergs/Rinderknech | 33c | 33.5$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.44 | 2,735 | 34%931 W · 1,804 L | -13.2wins | 0.00per pick | 35cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa509…ae46backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 56c | 27$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.78 | 6,786 | 48.8%3,310 W · 3,476 L | +56.2wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -15.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa44a…88ecbacked Balaji/Ram | 56c | 26.64$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 525 | 57%299 W · 226 L | +10.5wins | +0.02per pick | 55cpaid | +2.7%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x99bc…4f35backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 49c | 26$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.26 | 1,379 | 16.4%226 W · 1,153 L | -108.5wins | -0.08per pick | 24cpaid | -49.2%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xad47…cde3backed Bergs/Rinderknech | 75c | 16$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4 | 7 | 71.4%5 W · 2 L | +1.1wins | +0.15per pick | 56cpaid | +12.4%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Bergs/Rinderknech | 70c | 14.9$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.47 | 6,439 | 54.4%3,502 W · 2,937 L | +285.2wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +26.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.