MLB · resolved market
Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 10.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x2e89cff8c55eede07d59de778c6f642d91e5dfc1aa18f2496f897d8bd0bd7a32
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,160
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,276
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,160 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in MLB | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x39fc…e2f2backed Under | 57c | 1,634$930 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$703.92 | 3,208 | 51.2%1,642 W · 1,566 L | +146.6wins | +0.05per pick | 47cpaid | +8.6%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x5268…135dbacked Over | 43c | 1,588$683 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$682.8 | 11,357 | 52.9%6,003 W · 5,354 L | +209.9wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x842a…7422backed Under | 55c | 454.54$250 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$204.54 | 595 | 49.7%296 W · 299 L | -3.6wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -1.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Over | 45c | 432.65$195 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$194.69 | 12,247 | 46.4%5,687 W · 6,560 L | -68.6wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Over | 43c | 244.08$104 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$103.82 | 10,846 | 51.6%5,594 W · 5,252 L | +137.6wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -0.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdb70…52c0backed Under | 53c | 189.14$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$89.14 | 174 | 62.6%109 W · 65 L | +3.3wins | +0.02per pick | 61cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe401…7b88backed Over | 36c | 134.69$49 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$48.8 | 9,728 | 46.3%4,506 W · 5,222 L | +32.8wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -8.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x1631…072dbacked Under | 64c | 102.94$66 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$37.06 | 773 | 53.9%417 W · 356 L | +35.9wins | +0.05per pick | 49cpaid | +4.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xb208…e0b2backed Under | 69c | 68.12$47 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.12 | 84 | 57.1%48 W · 36 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 57cpaid | +0.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xbca0…9705backed Under | 70c | 65.91$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.7 | 8,470 | 52.6%4,459 W · 4,011 L | +510.0wins | +0.06per pick | 47cpaid | +5.3%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Over | 39c | 59.75$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.13 | 8,295 | 47.8%3,966 W · 4,329 L | +72.4wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1d64…527ebacked Under | 50c | 59.52$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$29.52 | 26 | 69.2%18 W · 8 L | +0.5wins | +0.02per pick | 67cpaid | 0%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xda77…683fbacked Under | 55c | 46.79$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.17 | 5,786 | 43.6%2,524 W · 3,262 L | -192.2wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -19.3%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5407…5bbdbacked Over | 53c | 25$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.25 | 778 | 36%280 W · 498 L | -17.2wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -5.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc1b5…c8f8backed Over | 50c | 20.18$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.02 | 1,708 | 49.9%852 W · 856 L | -17.8wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -4.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 11 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 10.5this page
- Athletics vs. Chicago CubsAthletics won
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 11.5Under won
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 12.5Under won
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 6.5Over won
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 7.5Over won
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 8.5Over won
- Athletics vs. Chicago Cubs: O/U 9.5Under won
- Spread: Athletics (-1.5)Chicago Cubs won
- Spread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)Athletics won
- Spread: Chicago Cubs (-2.5)Athletics won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.