South American Leagues · resolved market
Santos FC vs. Mirassol FC: O/U 2.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x3377871ff98b7870f096d1008ce9157056bbd62ea94606c0bca52d15e0e817c1
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- South American Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $874
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $874
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $874 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in South American Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Under | 68c | 433.89$294 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$139.8 | 2,388 | 51.8%1,237 W · 1,151 L | -9.3wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x908a…ad16backed Over | 32c | 400$128 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$128 | 636 | 44.7%284 W · 352 L | -2.0wins | 0.00per pick | 45cpaid | -12.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa8a3…a380backed Under | 49c | 241$118 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$122.91 | 8 | 50%4 W · 4 L | +0.9wins | +0.11per pick | 39cpaid | +32%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xacac…bd06backed Over | 50c | 95$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.85 | 12 | 50%6 W · 6 L | -0.3wins | -0.03per pick | 53cpaid | -12.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x699c…3600backed Under | 52c | 80$42 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$38.4 | 19 | 52.6%10 W · 9 L | -1.9wins | -0.10per pick | 63cpaid | -15.1%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x6014…5a58backed Over | 51c | 71$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36.21 | 5 | 40%2 W · 3 L | -0.2wins | -0.04per pick | 44cpaid | +9.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8deb…d8e2backed Over | 32c | 60$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.2 | 27 | 33.3%9 W · 18 L | -1.9wins | -0.07per pick | 40cpaid | -32.3%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x42bb…2138backed Over | 51c | 48$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$24.48 | 9 | 22.2%2 W · 7 L | -2.2wins | -0.25per pick | 47cpaid | -54.5%equal weight | 43-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x68e0…a3a6backed Under | 52c | 47$24 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.56 | 11 | 27.3%3 W · 8 L | -1.7wins | -0.16per pick | 43cpaid | -43.5%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xb81d…c6c0backed Under | 52c | 43$22 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.64 | 39 | 38.5%15 W · 24 L | -2.8wins | -0.07per pick | 46cpaid | -11.6%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x934a…9096backed Over | 51c | 40$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.4 | 9 | 33.3%3 W · 6 L | -1.1wins | -0.12per pick | 46cpaid | +9.6%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x97de…15eabacked Over | 48c | 36$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17.28 | 10 | 40%4 W · 6 L | -1.2wins | -0.12per pick | 52cpaid | -21.4%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 71c | 29$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.41 | 8,107 | 48.7%3,948 W · 4,159 L | +26.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -8.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xc86f…341dbacked Over | 49c | 28$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.65 | 5 | 40%2 W · 3 L | -0.9wins | -0.17per pick | 57cpaid | -34%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xe11a…d47ebacked Over | 48c | 21$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.08 | 15 | 60%9 W · 6 L | +1.6wins | +0.10per pick | 50cpaid | +12.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.