Lol · resolved market
Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2?
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x34fa1ec0e21384179e370f51f84a3b63f04ac859748aff708c20a2626c5c22c5
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Lolevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,061
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,219
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,061 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 12 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Lol is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Lol | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x6918…782bbacked Over | 58c | 2,670$1,549 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,121.37 | 1,522 | 54.7%832 W · 690 L | +37.3wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | +5.4%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x72a6…cfefbacked Under | 42c | 846.64$356 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$355.59 | 293 | 38.6%113 W · 180 L | -11.1wins | -0.04per pick | 42cpaid | -9.9%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa72a…5685backed Under | 42c | 667.73$280 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$280.45 | 74 | 36.5%27 W · 47 L | -8.5wins | -0.12per pick | 48cpaid | -34.3%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xb57f…0c96backed Under | 42c | 569.31$239 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$239.11 | 440 | 39.5%174 W · 266 L | -25.3wins | -0.06per pick | 45cpaid | -14.8%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x0193…bad1backed Under | 42c | 272.63$115 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$114.5 | 31 | 54.8%17 W · 14 L | +2.3wins | +0.07per pick | 47cpaid | +11.4%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x85d8…3cbebacked Over | 62c | 161.29$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$61.29 | 205 | 46.3%95 W · 110 L | +8.0wins | +0.04per pick | 42cpaid | +10.8%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x54a6…7401backed Under | 38c | 161.29$61 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$61.29 | 527 | 50.5%266 W · 261 L | +13.5wins | +0.03per pick | 48cpaid | +6%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1a1e…f992backed Under | 42c | 130.76$55 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$54.92 | 89 | 46.1%41 W · 48 L | +1.3wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | +0.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x8e69…553abacked Under | 42c | 95.24$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 160 | 48.8%78 W · 82 L | +2.5wins | +0.02per pick | 47cpaid | +9.3%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7462…3ac3backed Under | 42c | 44.76$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.8 | 1,014 | 47.6%483 W · 531 L | +8.5wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +0.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe93c…76ebbacked Under | 42c | 35.71$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 82 | 42.7%35 W · 47 L | -3.3wins | -0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -11.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xf4b9…01bdbacked Over | 64c | 18$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.48 | 50 | 66%33 W · 17 L | +0.5wins | +0.01per pick | 65cpaid | +0.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Lol and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 10 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 2?this page
- Game Handicap: IG (-1.5) vs ThunderTalk Gaming (+1.5)ThunderTalk Gaming won
- Game Handicap: IG (-2.5) vs ThunderTalk Gaming (+2.5)ThunderTalk Gaming won
- Games Total: O/U 3.5Under won
- LoL: Invictus Gaming vs ThunderTalk Gaming (BO5) - LPL Play-InThunderTalk Gaming won
- LoL: Invictus Gaming vs ThunderTalk Gaming - Game 1 WinnerThunderTalk Gaming won
- LoL: Invictus Gaming vs ThunderTalk Gaming - Game 2 WinnerThunderTalk Gaming won
- LoL: Invictus Gaming vs ThunderTalk Gaming - Game 3 WinnerThunderTalk Gaming won
- Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 1?Under won
- Total Kills Over/Under 27.5 in Game 3?Under won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.