Tennis · resolved market
Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Jesper de Jong vs Kamil Majchrzak
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x49550745d12d33d7dff176a70965b9974444293ce581dc2bbd59cda6ec5bc266
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Jongof Jong, Majchrzak
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,412
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,501
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,412 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 18 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x9354…6502backed Jong | 33c | 677.38$222 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$455.34 | 755 | 47.8%361 W · 394 L | +0.9wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -13.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xda35…ff0ebacked Majchrzak | 68c | 534$363 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$363.12 | 591 | 51.6%305 W · 286 L | +4.3wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +0.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0283…e7d3backed Jong | 49c | 387.76$190 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$197.76 | 202 | 57.4%116 W · 86 L | +9.0wins | +0.04per pick | 53cpaid | -1.8%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x2c43…b289backed Majchrzak | 8c | 343$26 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25.87 | 12 | 33.3%4 W · 8 L | -0.2wins | -0.02per pick | 35cpaid | -55.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdb28…d82cbacked Majchrzak | 31c | 176$55 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$54.56 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.9wins | -0.44per pick | 44cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x908a…ad16backed Majchrzak | 35c | 174$61 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$60.61 | 1,655 | 50.1%829 W · 826 L | +30.2wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -7.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x61c1…0513backed Majchrzak | 76c | 131.58$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 1,287 | 60.7%781 W · 506 L | -21.2wins | -0.02per pick | 62cpaid | -3.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xffaa…7fd4backed Majchrzak | 64c | 121.84$78 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$77.98 | 46 | 28.3%13 W · 33 L | -5.6wins | -0.12per pick | 40cpaid | -39.6%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x4c17…de2bbacked Jong | 46c | 108.7$50 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$58.7 | 79 | 57%45 W · 34 L | -1.4wins | -0.02per pick | 59cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xfb33…532cbacked Jong | 20c | 100$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$80 | 9 | 33.3%3 W · 6 L | +0.4wins | +0.04per pick | 29cpaid | +16.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdb1e…230abacked Majchrzak | 11c | 100$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11 | 318 | 19.2%61 W · 257 L | -8.0wins | -0.03per pick | 22cpaid | -20.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x875c…d3e8backed Majchrzak | 69c | 72.34$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 102 | 50%51 W · 51 L | -2.7wins | -0.03per pick | 53cpaid | -12.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x44f8…2d91backed Majchrzak | 32c | 66.3$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21 | 63 | 36.5%23 W · 40 L | -4.1wins | -0.07per pick | 43cpaid | -30.8%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x30ef…70dfbacked Jong | 32c | 60.29$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$41 | 441 | 25.4%112 W · 329 L | -11.3wins | -0.03per pick | 28cpaid | -13.8%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa61d…df1abacked Majchrzak | 68c | 58.82$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 104 | 57.7%60 W · 44 L | -3.2wins | -0.03per pick | 61cpaid | -2%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf102…1348backed Jong | 31c | 48.21$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.27 | 1,489 | 32.6%486 W · 1,003 L | +22.2wins | +0.01per pick | 31cpaid | +6.4%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5a84…e271backed Jong | 46c | 43.48$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23.48 | 139 | 59%82 W · 57 L | -3.6wins | -0.03per pick | 62cpaid | -4.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc1b7…d976backed Majchrzak | 72c | 27.78$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 7 | 28.6%2 W · 5 L | -2.9wins | -0.42per pick | 70cpaid | -60.7%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.