Other European Leagues · resolved market
FC København vs. Randers FC: O/U 2.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x4b9899e368a60501709c5603ffcc62c372f00d2fb24b6d7f1b012ad2e8904ded
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Other European Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,017
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,242
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,017 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Other European Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Other European Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xbe3c…a835backed Over | 44c | 500$220 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$280 | 269 | 49.8%134 W · 135 L | +5.8wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 48c | 346.99$166 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$165.73 | 7,889 | 45.4%3,579 W · 4,310 L | +11.2wins | 0.00per pick | 45cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xf588…2b81backed Under | 51c | 309.82$157 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$157.01 | 387 | 47.5%184 W · 203 L | +10.9wins | +0.03per pick | 45cpaid | -8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5f37…281bbacked Over | 34c | 291.77$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$191.77 | 142 | 17.6%25 W · 117 L | -5.6wins | -0.04per pick | 22cpaid | -29.6%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd6a3…9489backed Under | 60c | 272$163 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$163.2 | 834 | 40.8%340 W · 494 L | -35.3wins | -0.04per pick | 45cpaid | -15.4%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8314…0f1ebacked Over | 57c | 250$143 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$107.5 | 120 | 54.2%65 W · 55 L | +3.8wins | +0.03per pick | 51cpaid | +7.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Under | 53c | 219.77$117 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$117.09 | 985 | 52.3%515 W · 470 L | +4.6wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -2.2%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3880…ab7dbacked Over | 50c | 200$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$100 | 178 | 50.6%90 W · 88 L | -8.1wins | -0.05per pick | 55cpaid | -16.9%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xcb9a…412ebacked Over | 58c | 172.41$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$72.41 | 17 | 17.6%3 W · 14 L | -4.8wins | -0.28per pick | 46cpaid | -68.4%equal weight | 37-0.11 edge/pick |
| 0x49ed…a2fbbacked Under | 43c | 103$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44.29 | 70 | 54.3%38 W · 32 L | +8.8wins | +0.13per pick | 42cpaid | +31.5%equal weight | 60+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x7baf…99a7backed Over | 16c | 95.45$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$80.45 | 44 | 15.9%7 W · 37 L | +0.2wins | +0.01per pick | 15cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0aa0…be2dbacked Under | 53c | 75.47$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 21 | 38.1%8 W · 13 L | -3.1wins | -0.15per pick | 53cpaid | -28.2%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Under | 43c | 71$31 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30.81 | 2,543 | 52.4%1,333 W · 1,210 L | +18.3wins | +0.01per pick | 52cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked Under | 50c | 57.96$29 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$28.88 | 2,309 | 42.8%988 W · 1,321 L | -41.2wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -13.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Under | 61c | 50.93$31 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31.16 | 5,604 | 42%2,356 W · 3,248 L | +75.1wins | +0.01per pick | 41cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4813…c24abacked Under | 46c | 49.99$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.5wins | -0.46per pick | 46cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1d94…9100backed Over | 54c | 48.14$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.14 | 1,401 | 29.2%409 W · 992 L | -32.2wins | -0.02per pick | 31cpaid | -15.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4f2c…9d16backed Over | 42c | 47.62$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.62 | 62 | 38.7%24 W · 38 L | -3.1wins | -0.05per pick | 44cpaid | -8.8%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x63c9…26dfbacked Under | 46c | 23.02$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.59 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.5wins | -0.46per pick | 46cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xef18…4d70backed Over | 56c | 22.6$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.94 | 338 | 58.6%198 W · 140 L | +30.9wins | +0.09per pick | 49cpaid | +31.5%equal weight | 59+0.09 edge/pick |
| 0x680f…3c09backed Over | 56c | 21.38$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.48 | 1 | 100%1 W · 0 L | +0.4wins | +0.44per pick | 56cpaid | +79.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Other European Leagues and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- FC København vs. Randers FC: O/U 2.5this page
- FC København vs. Randers FC: Both Teams to ScoreYes won
- FC København vs. Randers FC: O/U 1.5Over won
- FC København vs. Randers FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- FC København vs. Randers FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: FC København (-1.5)Randers FC won
- Spread: Randers FC (-2.5)FC København won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.