Asian League · resolved market
Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 3.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x52010aa4f13a072fef58a850fc17ed83cfd3c513db6ebeca23a0c078e1b3abef
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $6,126
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $8,653
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $6,126 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 13 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xabce…2f87backed Over | 31c | 1,600$495 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,104.99 | 260 | 52.7%137 W · 123 L | +10.8wins | +0.04per pick | 49cpaid | +13%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 77c | 1,116$860 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$860.29 | 5,946 | 46.1%2,743 W · 3,203 L | +50.5wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Under | 72c | 1,061$764 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$763.63 | 1,309 | 56.8%743 W · 566 L | +66.1wins | +0.05per pick | 52cpaid | +14.6%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xe550…4ebbbacked Over | 27c | 667$183 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$484 | 218 | 30.7%67 W · 151 L | -1.4wins | -0.01per pick | 31cpaid | -6.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xcf37…993fbacked Over | 4c | 299$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$287.04 | 119 | 31.9%38 W · 81 L | +0.6wins | +0.01per pick | 31cpaid | +20.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Under | 78c | 271.82$212 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$211.75 | 2,522 | 42.3%1,067 W · 1,455 L | +54.6wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -5.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x3234…8b1abacked Under | 65c | 118.19$77 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$76.82 | 6 | 33.3%2 W · 4 L | -1.5wins | -0.25per pick | 58cpaid | -49.4%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xd37a…2358backed Over | 25c | 76.75$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$57.56 | 899 | 55.1%495 W · 404 L | +5.6wins | +0.01per pick | 54cpaid | -4.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3982…2befbacked Under | 65c | 69$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44.85 | 345 | 58.6%202 W · 143 L | +0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 59cpaid | -5.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x37e9…ab9fbacked Over | 28c | 60$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$43.11 | 9 | 33.3%3 W · 6 L | +1.4wins | +0.15per pick | 18cpaid | +45.5%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc551…fa51backed Over | 40c | 35.29$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.2 | 96 | 72.9%70 W · 26 L | +19.3wins | +0.20per pick | 53cpaid | +145.7%equal weight | 68+0.16 edge/pick |
| 0x491c…b765backed Under | 75c | 20$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15 | 107 | 73.8%79 W · 28 L | -0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 74cpaid | -1.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3d90…3bbdbacked Under | 75c | 15$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.25 | 23 | 60.9%14 W · 9 L | +0.4wins | +0.02per pick | 59cpaid | +8.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 3.5this page
- Spread: Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC (-1.5)Wuhan San Zhen FC won
- Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: Both Teams to ScoreYes won
- Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 1.5Over won
- Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 2.5Over won
- Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 4.5Under won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.