Tennis · resolved market
Set Handicap: Zverev (-1.5) vs Bergs (+1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x5d7ae6354e8fc403c2eeeffd8618308e120e893bae9b483380153dc53e189a5b
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Zverevof Zverev, Bergs
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $7,376
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $9,898
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $7,376 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Bergs | 25c | 977.72$245 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$245.14 | 7,018 | 43.2%3,031 W · 3,987 L | +124.9wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x48de…95babacked Zverev | 77c | 903.02$692 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$210.86 | 625 | 45.4%284 W · 341 L | -7.7wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -3.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc19e…c764backed Bergs | 21c | 582.89$122 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$122.12 | 15 | 40%6 W · 9 L | -1.0wins | -0.07per pick | 47cpaid | -16.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4248…50febacked Zverev | 78c | 567.28$442 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$124.8 | 354 | 36.4%129 W · 225 L | -16.8wins | -0.05per pick | 41cpaid | -13.7%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc905…850bbacked Zverev | 78c | 397.86$310 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$87.78 | 357 | 55.5%198 W · 159 L | +0.5wins | 0.00per pick | 55cpaid | 0%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xe4d0…8814backed Zverev | 72c | 359.14$259 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$100.56 | 4 | 100%4 W · 0 L | +1.2wins | +0.31per pick | 69cpaid | +46.9%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x06c2…184fbacked Bergs | 24c | 300$72 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$72 | 243 | 40.3%98 W · 145 L | -11.6wins | -0.05per pick | 45cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xcd30…2828backed Zverev | 77c | 253.59$195 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$58.33 | 6 | 33.3%2 W · 4 L | -0.7wins | -0.12per pick | 46cpaid | -38%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9ece…8786backed Bergs | 47c | 205.52$97 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$96.83 | 155 | 48.4%75 W · 80 L | -2.7wins | -0.02per pick | 50cpaid | +0.6%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Bergs | 23c | 146.95$34 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$34.5 | 9,286 | 44.3%4,110 W · 5,176 L | -245.7wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1650…42f6backed Bergs | 25c | 122.24$31 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30.56 | 69 | 33.3%23 W · 46 L | +1.4wins | +0.02per pick | 31cpaid | +11.6%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Zverev | 54c | 118.54$63 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$55.09 | 7,139 | 49.7%3,548 W · 3,591 L | +109.9wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +3.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc60b…d9f7backed Bergs | 42c | 100$42 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42 | 354 | 39.8%141 W · 213 L | -15.0wins | -0.04per pick | 44cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x2dcc…45f6backed Zverev | 58c | 67.39$39 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$28.4 | 73 | 45.2%33 W · 40 L | -10.4wins | -0.14per pick | 59cpaid | -29%equal weight | 38-0.11 edge/pick |
| 0xef49…1207backed Zverev | 59c | 49.96$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.7 | 57 | 49.1%28 W · 29 L | +3.7wins | +0.07per pick | 43cpaid | +12.6%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xe80f…b81bbacked Zverev | 60c | 48.8$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.52 | 180 | 59.4%107 W · 73 L | -9.2wins | -0.05per pick | 65cpaid | -10%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x51eb…6bfabacked Zverev | 60c | 32.53$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.01 | 2,561 | 63%1,613 W · 948 L | -10.2wins | 0.00per pick | 63cpaid | -0.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0045…9007backed Zverev | 63c | 31.99$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.92 | 265 | 48.7%129 W · 136 L | -2.8wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x9c76…c926backed Bergs | 41c | 28.5$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.69 | 4,076 | 39.7%1,620 W · 2,456 L | +93.7wins | +0.02per pick | 37cpaid | +7.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfc7e…70ecbacked Zverev | 52c | 20$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.6 | 1,001 | 45.4%454 W · 547 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 45cpaid | +1.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xc6fa…51e5backed Zverev | 77c | 13.31$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3.06 | 262 | 44.7%117 W · 145 L | -15.6wins | -0.06per pick | 51cpaid | -17%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Set Handicap: Zverev (-1.5) vs Bergs (+1.5)this page
- Bergs vs. Zverev: Match O/U 21.5Under won
- Rolex Monte Carlo Masters: Zizou Bergs vs Alexander ZverevAlexander Zverev won
- Set 1 Winner: Bergs vs ZverevZverev won
- Zizou Bergs vs. Alexander Zverev: Total Sets O/U 2.5Under 2.5 won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.