Tennis · resolved market
ITF Saarlouis: Yannik Kelm vs Marcel Zielinski
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x7f7574bb0546ba8178cce644708c0905e6407082caa5fdfbbfef348f54fbcd0d
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Marcel Zielinskiof Yannik Kelm, Marcel Zielinski
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,370
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,383
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,370 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x99d7…6435backed Marcel Zielinski | 8c | 3,149$238 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$2,910.12 | 1,148 | 53%608 W · 540 L | +25.5wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | +22.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd218…b5c9backed Yannik Kelm | 33c | 147.48$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$48 | 6,720 | 36.9%2,479 W · 4,241 L | -95.8wins | -0.01per pick | 38cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x14e7…a32cbacked Yannik Kelm | 60c | 117$70 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$69.66 | 1,349 | 49.8%672 W · 677 L | -6.5wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -7.2%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Marcel Zielinski | 58c | 107.58$63 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$44.73 | 6,439 | 54.4%3,502 W · 2,937 L | +285.2wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +26.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x775d…6bebbacked Yannik Kelm | 59c | 81.56$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$48.41 | 1,767 | 52.1%920 W · 847 L | -2.2wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x629d…756cbacked Yannik Kelm | 47c | 65.25$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30.49 | 2,082 | 52.3%1,088 W · 994 L | +19.0wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -5.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc70b…d2f2backed Marcel Zielinski | 57c | 44.99$26 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.34 | 139 | 66.2%92 W · 47 L | +17.0wins | +0.12per pick | 54cpaid | +22.3%equal weight | 62+0.10 edge/pick |
| 0xf66e…14b7backed Marcel Zielinski | 56c | 42.78$24 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.64 | 727 | 55.6%404 W · 323 L | +27.9wins | +0.04per pick | 52cpaid | +4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x7edb…7993backed Yannik Kelm | 27c | 40$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.68 | 1,459 | 50.1%731 W · 728 L | +0.4wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -16.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x6318…46b1backed Marcel Zielinski | 41c | 36.08$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.29 | 5,261 | 28.8%1,514 W · 3,747 L | -19.4wins | 0.00per pick | 29cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xdc89…095cbacked Marcel Zielinski | 59c | 32$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.2 | 32 | 68.8%22 W · 10 L | +4.7wins | +0.15per pick | 54cpaid | +24.8%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xb91c…ed66backed Marcel Zielinski | 34c | 29.42$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.42 | 578 | 45.7%264 W · 314 L | +10.5wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | +5.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2488…ff0ebacked Marcel Zielinski | 64c | 28.18$18 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.18 | 486 | 50.6%246 W · 240 L | +7.5wins | +0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -1.3%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe5b1…30b2backed Marcel Zielinski | 58c | 24.17$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.03 | 1,276 | 61%778 W · 498 L | +27.7wins | +0.02per pick | 59cpaid | +2.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5edb…00a9backed Marcel Zielinski | 55c | 22.73$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.26 | 238 | 42.9%102 W · 136 L | -21.2wins | -0.09per pick | 52cpaid | -26.6%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x076d…8d4cbacked Yannik Kelm | 59c | 19.14$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.29 | 4,241 | 52.6%2,232 W · 2,009 L | +65.0wins | +0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -1.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb155…ca84backed Yannik Kelm | 62c | 17$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.51 | 920 | 46.6%429 W · 491 L | -14.2wins | -0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -9.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.