La Liga · resolved market
UD Almería vs. CD Mirandés: O/U 4.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x9a815041cc4e8e8f167888bacf7db35806d13a0581be310efd619f6dafeb4f12
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- La Ligaevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $8,839
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $11,474
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $8,839 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in La Liga is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in La Liga | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x4f42…8bbcbacked Over | 28c | 1,457$415 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,042.06 | 177 | 31.1%55 W · 122 L | -3.5wins | -0.02per pick | 33cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5028…91c5backed Under | 12c | 1,176$137 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$136.93 | 113 | 36.3%41 W · 72 L | +1.9wins | +0.02per pick | 35cpaid | +4.3%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Over | 69c | 787.89$545 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$243.21 | 4,740 | 47%2,230 W · 2,510 L | -23.9wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -10.8%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Under | 71c | 658.39$466 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$465.96 | 3,449 | 43%1,484 W · 1,965 L | +32.1wins | +0.01per pick | 42cpaid | -10.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1105…09d0backed Under | 77c | 580.57$447 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$447.04 | 55 | 70.9%39 W · 16 L | +1.3wins | +0.02per pick | 69cpaid | +5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5ae2…6ca6backed Over | 80c | 400$320 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$80 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.3wins | +0.12per pick | 55cpaid | +15.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2f2b…d743backed Over | 26c | 389.7$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$289.7 | 97 | 22.7%22 W · 75 L | -8.6wins | -0.09per pick | 32cpaid | -29.1%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x9cb4…8285backed Under | 20c | 272.64$54 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$54.34 | 744 | 57.5%428 W · 316 L | +22.4wins | +0.03per pick | 55cpaid | +1.7%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x3b5c…126ebacked Under | 72c | 196.22$142 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$142.09 | 354 | 42.7%151 W · 203 L | +7.2wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -7.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xbe0c…c0cdbacked Under | 13c | 192.31$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 47 | 48.9%23 W · 24 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -2.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x7d0c…a3b7backed Under | 74c | 159$118 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$117.66 | 1,081 | 50.6%547 W · 534 L | +11.7wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa710…f1ccbacked Over | 25c | 120$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$90 | 114 | 27.2%31 W · 83 L | -4.9wins | -0.04per pick | 31cpaid | -17.6%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6e5b…bb9abacked Under | 78c | 102.56$80 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$80 | 99 | 50.5%50 W · 49 L | +3.1wins | +0.03per pick | 47cpaid | +12.8%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe479…70dfbacked Under | 21c | 94.11$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.41 | 7 | 42.9%3 W · 4 L | +1.3wins | +0.18per pick | 25cpaid | +89.5%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x9132…6607backed Under | 13c | 92.31$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12 | 37 | 37.8%14 W · 23 L | -3.1wins | -0.08per pick | 46cpaid | -18.1%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Under | 74c | 86$64 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$64.01 | 1,566 | 51.6%808 W · 758 L | -8.8wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -0.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1d50…d283backed Over | 23c | 60.77$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$46.8 | 120 | 52.5%63 W · 57 L | +7.9wins | +0.07per pick | 46cpaid | +8.1%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x7066…50e5backed Under | 20c | 50$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 33 | 66.7%22 W · 11 L | +0.6wins | +0.02per pick | 65cpaid | -3.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x435d…c52abacked Over | 24c | 47.65$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$36.21 | 51 | 19.6%10 W · 41 L | -1.9wins | -0.04per pick | 23cpaid | -23.7%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdd96…11ebbacked Under | 80c | 46$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36.57 | 4 | 75%3 W · 1 L | +0.1wins | +0.02per pick | 73cpaid | +6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x491c…b765backed Under | 77c | 20$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.4 | 74 | 54.1%40 W · 34 L | -9.0wins | -0.12per pick | 66cpaid | -21.8%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in La Liga and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- UD Almería vs. CD Mirandés: O/U 4.5this page
- Spread: UD Almería (-1.5)UD Almería won
- Spread: UD Almería (-2.5)CD Mirandés won
- UD Almería vs. CD Mirandés: Both Teams to ScoreYes won
- UD Almería vs. CD Mirandés: O/U 1.5Over won
- UD Almería vs. CD Mirandés: O/U 2.5Over won
- UD Almería vs. CD Mirandés: O/U 3.5Over won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.