College Football · resolved market
Spread: Illinois (-9.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa69e5f870818f2c2aa9d1061a0c2a2dcae29378636de9d0231f637c11a2c5a92
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Wisconsin Badgersof Illinois, Wisconsin Badgers
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- College Footballevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,758
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,149
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,758 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in College Football is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in College Football | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xe60a…6a47backed Illinois | 50c | 2,170$1,080 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,080.19 | 524 | 49.4%259 W · 265 L | -2.5wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8753…85adbacked Wisconsin Badgers | 50c | 1,600$800 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$800 | 176 | 55.1%97 W · 79 L | +3.2wins | +0.02per pick | 53cpaid | +2.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4488…e319backed Wisconsin Badgers | 51c | 1,077$548 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$529.29 | 399 | 54.1%216 W · 183 L | +16.7wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +7.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x16b2…a881backed Illinois | 49c | 1,039$509 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$509.22 | 935 | 48.4%453 W · 482 L | +11.9wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +1.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7da6…4ff3backed Wisconsin Badgers | 51c | 461$235 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$225.89 | 47 | 44.7%21 W · 26 L | -1.8wins | -0.04per pick | 48cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xee61…debfbacked Illinois | 49c | 392.16$192 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$192.16 | 2,013 | 49.6%999 W · 1,014 L | +24.2wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc869…8a6ebacked Wisconsin Badgers | 51c | 392.16$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$192.16 | 179 | 46.9%84 W · 95 L | +4.2wins | +0.02per pick | 45cpaid | +6.1%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Illinois | 48c | 309$148 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$148.04 | 588 | 50.2%295 W · 293 L | +23.4wins | +0.04per pick | 46cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xde04…fa37backed Wisconsin Badgers | 52c | 269$140 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$129.12 | 632 | 43.7%276 W · 356 L | +34.8wins | +0.06per pick | 38cpaid | +138.5%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x9da3…a7efbacked Illinois | 51c | 98.04$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 44 | 50%22 W · 22 L | -1.6wins | -0.04per pick | 54cpaid | -8.1%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5137…1556backed Wisconsin Badgers | 50c | 89$45 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$44.5 | 1,090 | 41.7%455 W · 635 L | -5.9wins | -0.01per pick | 42cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbda3…ef65backed Wisconsin Badgers | 53c | 83$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$38.72 | 97 | 54.6%53 W · 44 L | +1.5wins | +0.02per pick | 53cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb82d…5d1ebacked Wisconsin Badgers | 52c | 65$34 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$31.2 | 11 | 54.5%6 W · 5 L | +0.4wins | +0.03per pick | 51cpaid | +6.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5779…168dbacked Wisconsin Badgers | 51c | 39.22$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.22 | 60 | 60%36 W · 24 L | +5.9wins | +0.10per pick | 50cpaid | +18.3%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xb385…c1a4backed Illinois | 48c | 21$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.08 | 6 | 50%3 W · 3 L | +0.2wins | +0.03per pick | 47cpaid | +5.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in College Football and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Spread: Illinois (-9.5)this page
- Illinois vs. Wisconsin BadgersWisconsin Badgers won
- O/U 41.5Under won
- Spread: Illinois (-7.5)Wisconsin Badgers won
- Spread: Illinois (-8.5)Wisconsin Badgers won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.