Serie A · resolved market
Cagliari Calcio vs. Genoa CFC: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xbedb5703c19008b8ad39af1ab82e9c08ad4809f7839e5e06aa8ffac76c061a9d
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Serie Aevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $11,401
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $11,546
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $11,401 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Serie A is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Serie A | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x106b…4e8bbacked Yes | 43c | 10,488$4,501 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5,987.46 | 32 | 50%16 W · 16 L | +1.2wins | +0.04per pick | 46cpaid | +9.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed No | 57c | 7,493$4,279 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$4,279.48 | 2,538 | 45.9%1,164 W · 1,374 L | +13.8wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -12.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdbb9…ed8dbacked No | 57c | 1,462$833 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$833.06 | 333 | 57.4%191 W · 142 L | +4.7wins | +0.01per pick | 56cpaid | +8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2652…2a1dbacked No | 57c | 785.94$450 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$450.24 | 527 | 48%253 W · 274 L | -35.4wins | -0.07per pick | 55cpaid | -18.2%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x5137…1556backed No | 57c | 450.02$255 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$255 | 120 | 49.2%59 W · 61 L | +7.5wins | +0.06per pick | 43cpaid | +17.9%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xb113…8bc6backed No | 56c | 444$249 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$248.64 | 99 | 58.6%58 W · 41 L | +2.4wins | +0.02per pick | 56cpaid | +3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9117…cecabacked Yes | 43c | 232.56$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$132.56 | 85 | 48.2%41 W · 44 L | -2.1wins | -0.02per pick | 51cpaid | -1.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa8f5…1caabacked No | 58c | 78$45 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$45.24 | 144 | 52.1%75 W · 69 L | -0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x79df…1661backed Yes | 45c | 77.78$35 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$42.78 | 120 | 33.3%40 W · 80 L | -1.2wins | -0.01per pick | 34cpaid | -8.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x11f0…890dbacked Yes | 42c | 67$28 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$38.86 | 116 | 66.4%77 W · 39 L | +14.6wins | +0.13per pick | 54cpaid | +27%equal weight | 62+0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x5309…1975backed Yes | 48c | 62.91$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32.91 | 17 | 35.3%6 W · 11 L | -3.2wins | -0.19per pick | 54cpaid | -27.3%equal weight | 42-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x6a5c…b3f2backed No | 61c | 59.67$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36.29 | 89 | 52.8%47 W · 42 L | +6.0wins | +0.07per pick | 46cpaid | +7%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x522f…79c2backed Yes | 42c | 47.07$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.07 | 10 | 40%4 W · 6 L | +0.6wins | +0.06per pick | 34cpaid | -2.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2394…9312backed Yes | 42c | 24.9$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.44 | 29 | 41.4%12 W · 17 L | -2.5wins | -0.09per pick | 50cpaid | -17.4%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x6c82…6150backed No | 58c | 24$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.92 | 133 | 50.4%67 W · 66 L | -6.0wins | -0.04per pick | 55cpaid | -8.4%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x9731…9b35backed No | 57c | 23.07$13 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.15 | 387 | 44.7%173 W · 214 L | -10.8wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -8.7%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Serie A and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 3 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Cagliari Calcio vs. Genoa CFC: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Cagliari Calcio vs. Genoa CFC: O/U 2.5Over won
- Spread: Cagliari Calcio (-1.5)Genoa CFC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.