Tennis · resolved market
Zheng vs. Norrie: Match O/U 38.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xc52f13d48a395e21c2cb26adf6ab2070c66abc3bcfddc0450809ceb94748530b
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $895
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $894
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $895 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 11 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x707b…69f2backed Over | 56c | 354.37$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$154.37 | 311 | 46%143 W · 168 L | -8.7wins | -0.03per pick | 49cpaid | -7.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x7547…d158backed Under | 46c | 309.43$142 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$142.43 | 7,049 | 39.7%2,795 W · 4,254 L | -20.5wins | 0.00per pick | 40cpaid | +0.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x203a…ada4backed Over | 54c | 300$162 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$138 | 12 | 58.3%7 W · 5 L | -0.3wins | -0.03per pick | 61cpaid | -6.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5e30…acbfbacked Under | 44c | 199$88 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$87.56 | 7,724 | 47.8%3,691 W · 4,033 L | +41.2wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +1.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Over | 46c | 170$78 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$91.8 | 9,286 | 44.3%4,110 W · 5,176 L | -245.7wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Under | 43c | 90$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$38.7 | 6,449 | 46.3%2,987 W · 3,462 L | -42.9wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -13%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc4db…7e0cbacked Under | 43c | 65.37$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$28.11 | 3,871 | 35%1,353 W · 2,518 L | +92.5wins | +0.02per pick | 33cpaid | +8.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6770…c3bdbacked Under | 54c | 50$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27 | 923 | 52.5%485 W · 438 L | +10.2wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x775d…6bebbacked Under | 54c | 50$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27 | 1,767 | 52.1%920 W · 847 L | -2.2wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8a80…11c5backed Under | 54c | 50$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27 | 739 | 51.7%382 W · 357 L | -4.9wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -6.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xddb6…b9b3backed Under | 54c | 20$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.8 | 1,725 | 52.2%901 W · 824 L | -8.0wins | 0.00per pick | 53cpaid | -5.2%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Zheng vs. Norrie: Match O/U 38.5this page
- Michael Zheng vs. Cameron Norrie: Total Sets O/U 3.5Over 3.5 won
- Michael Zheng vs. Cameron Norrie: Total Sets O/U 4.5Over 4.5 won
- Set 1 Winner: Zheng vs NorrieNorrie won
- Set 2 Winner: Zheng vs NorrieZheng won
- Set Handicap: Norrie (-1.5) vs Zheng (+1.5)Zheng won
- Set Handicap: Norrie (-2.5) vs Zheng (+2.5)Zheng won
- Wimbledon ATP: Michael Zheng vs Cameron NorrieMichael Zheng won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.