Tennis · resolved market
Set 1 Winner: Rublev vs Borges
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xc83c1f4725232b066685b8d378f64988c2790ac356926552242d911f45d3ae6f
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Rublevof Rublev, Borges
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,057
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,294
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,057 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Borges | 7c | 990.57$71 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$70.63 | 7,018 | 43.2%3,031 W · 3,987 L | +124.9wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x0e1b…ecafbacked Borges | 12c | 385.68$47 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$46.91 | 2,523 | 39.6%1,000 W · 1,523 L | -3.1wins | 0.00per pick | 40cpaid | -13.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x95fc…10f6backed Borges | 11c | 267.51$29 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.15 | 29 | 34.5%10 W · 19 L | -0.9wins | -0.03per pick | 37cpaid | -34.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x200f…7a96backed Borges | 28c | 239.84$68 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$67.82 | 7,201 | 49.7%3,577 W · 3,624 L | +114.6wins | +0.02per pick | 48cpaid | +3.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdc5a…daf0backed Borges | 40c | 120.5$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$48.2 | 5 | 60%3 W · 2 L | +0.4wins | +0.07per pick | 53cpaid | +4.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc4db…7e0cbacked Borges | 34c | 96.04$33 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$32.7 | 3,891 | 35%1,362 W · 2,529 L | +93.9wins | +0.02per pick | 33cpaid | +8.3%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x2546…5155backed Rublev | 70c | 91.08$64 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.32 | 123 | 50.4%62 W · 61 L | -9.4wins | -0.08per pick | 58cpaid | -12%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x622b…5a4abacked Rublev | 66c | 74.21$49 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$25.23 | 350 | 40.9%143 W · 207 L | +0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 41cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5580…57a3backed Rublev | 71c | 73.67$52 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.36 | 44 | 70.5%31 W · 13 L | +4.7wins | +0.11per pick | 60cpaid | +13.9%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Borges | 14c | 73.62$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.31 | 9,406 | 44.3%4,171 W · 5,235 L | -245.4wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -12%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xc9ab…f61cbacked Rublev | 73c | 49.86$36 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.46 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.2wins | +0.06per pick | 60cpaid | -5.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x11b3…48b6backed Rublev | 71c | 39.3$28 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.4 | 49 | 57.1%28 W · 21 L | -2.1wins | -0.04per pick | 61cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xb847…566dbacked Rublev | 71c | 37.36$27 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.83 | 73 | 61.6%45 W · 28 L | -3.1wins | -0.04per pick | 66cpaid | -5.8%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xe4f0…b9f2backed Rublev | 75c | 20.41$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.1 | 4 | 25%1 W · 3 L | -0.5wins | -0.13per pick | 38cpaid | -66.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4437…503ebacked Rublev | 73c | 20.22$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.46 | 49 | 73.5%36 W · 13 L | +2.2wins | +0.04per pick | 69cpaid | +7.1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xbbdf…b8a0backed Rublev | 73c | 15.36$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.15 | 121 | 60.3%73 W · 48 L | -0.8wins | -0.01per pick | 61cpaid | -3.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Set 1 Winner: Rublev vs Borgesthis page
- Rolex Monte Carlo Masters: Andrey Rublev vs Nuno BorgesAndrey Rublev won
- Rublev vs. Borges: Match O/U 21.5Over won
- Rublev vs. Borges: Match O/U 22.5Over won
- Set Handicap: Rublev (-1.5) vs Borges (+1.5)Borges won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.