Tennis · resolved market
Set Handicap: Assche (-1.5) vs Carabelli (+1.5)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xe3e8f1bb34104a81d53e4a94b845a6ed845bbace5cccb0de3292a5c9be9671b7
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Carabelliof Assche, Carabelli
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,690
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,886
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,690 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xb4d0…a1c5backed Carabelli | 61c | 893.78$547 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$346.82 | 1,566 | 40%627 W · 939 L | -32.0wins | -0.02per pick | 42cpaid | -8.5%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x507e…beaebacked Assche | 41c | 620.42$255 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$254.83 | 7,018 | 43.2%3,031 W · 3,987 L | +124.9wins | +0.02per pick | 41cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xcd8c…f75abacked Carabelli | 54c | 360.1$194 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$165.62 | 327 | 63.9%209 W · 118 L | +15.6wins | +0.05per pick | 59cpaid | +11.7%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x6814…d83abacked Assche | 32c | 320$102 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$102.4 | 131 | 35.9%47 W · 84 L | +0.4wins | 0.00per pick | 36cpaid | -1.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0e1b…ecafbacked Assche | 41c | 299.79$122 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$122.02 | 2,523 | 39.6%1,000 W · 1,523 L | -3.1wins | 0.00per pick | 40cpaid | -13.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x0c99…0c88backed Assche | 67c | 299.59$202 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$201.51 | 9,286 | 44.3%4,110 W · 5,176 L | -245.7wins | -0.03per pick | 47cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x211d…3ab7backed Carabelli | 42c | 230.48$97 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$133.97 | 179 | 55.9%100 W · 79 L | +5.4wins | +0.03per pick | 53cpaid | +1%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5e30…acbfbacked Carabelli | 68c | 178.63$121 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$57.16 | 7,724 | 47.8%3,691 W · 4,033 L | +41.2wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +1.2%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1dd2…9e07backed Carabelli | 68c | 135.22$92 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$43.27 | 2,418 | 51.7%1,249 W · 1,169 L | +10.3wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | +0.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x18ed…04cbbacked Assche | 55c | 100$55 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$55 | 43 | 58.1%25 W · 18 L | -0.4wins | -0.01per pick | 59cpaid | -0.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0eb0…f195backed Carabelli | 45c | 90.25$41 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$49.64 | 17 | 47.1%8 W · 9 L | +0.3wins | +0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xef27…bd29backed Assche | 69c | 71.12$49 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$49.07 | 63 | 54%34 W · 29 L | -0.6wins | -0.01per pick | 55cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa106…5abbbacked Carabelli | 42c | 33.76$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19.58 | 90 | 58.9%53 W · 37 L | +5.7wins | +0.06per pick | 53cpaid | +9%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x9bd9…084fbacked Assche | 59c | 30$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17.7 | 450 | 51.8%233 W · 217 L | +11.9wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd78e…6421backed Carabelli | 68c | 20$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.4 | 935 | 57.3%536 W · 399 L | -12.4wins | -0.01per pick | 59cpaid | -2.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Set Handicap: Assche (-1.5) vs Carabelli (+1.5)this page
- Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs. Luca Van Assche: Total Sets O/U 2.5Over 2.5 won
- Carabelli vs. Assche: Match O/U 23.5Under won
- Carabelli vs. Assche: Set 1 Games O/U 8.5Under won
- Grand Prix Hassan II: Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Luca Van AsscheCamilo Ugo Carabelli won
- Set 1 Winner: Carabelli vs AsscheAssche won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.