TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

La Liga · resolved market

Will Burgos CF vs. CD Leganés end in a draw?

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Noof Yes, No
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
La Ligaevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$2,693
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$2,717

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,693 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 22 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in La Liga is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in La Liga
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x397e…3d84backed No10c974$100 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$874.349057.1%280 W · 210 L+26.6wins+0.05per pick52cpaid+11.8%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick
0x6580…6fa8backed Yes34c294.86$100 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$100.253339.4%13 W · 20 L+1.7wins+0.05per pick34cpaid+12.5%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0xf18a…e4e5backed No10c280$28 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$25210441.3%43 W · 61 L+1.7wins+0.02per pick40cpaid-4.7%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0x2a9b…7303backed No66c268.5$177 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$91.296553.8%35 W · 30 L-1.6wins-0.02per pick56cpaid-0.9%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0178…3f7abacked No50c180$89 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$90.84465.9%29 W · 15 L+4.9wins+0.11per pick55cpaid+20.9%equal weight58+0.07 edge/pick
0x7a49…d9f5backed No11c109$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$97.0158548%281 W · 304 L+10.6wins+0.02per pick46cpaid-13.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x5eeb…01b2backed No46c87.92$40 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$47.8515643.6%68 W · 88 L-0.6wins0.00per pick44cpaid-8.7%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x4a8d…31eabacked Yes35c82.29$29 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$28.849447%232 W · 262 L+8.3wins+0.02per pick45cpaid+1.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xfccd…02d6backed No65c80$52 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$286762.7%42 W · 25 L+1.8wins+0.03per pick60cpaid-0.9%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x507e…beaebacked No65c48.03$31 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$16.811,79851.4%924 W · 874 L+6.3wins0.00per pick51cpaid-2.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x204f…5e14backed No70c46.35$32 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$14.054,75347.1%2,238 W · 2,515 L-21.3wins0.00per pick48cpaid-10.7%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x7ea5…de7bbacked Yes32c40.97$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$13.282,34748.5%1,138 W · 1,209 L+1.4wins0.00per pick48cpaid-2.3%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x47a4…5e64backed Yes35c36.57$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.8333.3%1 W · 2 L-0.4wins-0.13per pick47cpaid-41.5%equal weight48-0.01 edge/pick
0xbc67…5286backed Yes71c32.24$23 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$22.894238.1%16 W · 26 L-4.2wins-0.10per pick48cpaid-28.5%equal weight43-0.06 edge/pick
0x7272…505dbacked Yes34c31.88$11 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$10.84250%1 W · 1 L-0.1wins-0.07per pick57cpaid-37.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x01c7…e995backed Yes46c30.86$14 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$14.091,42145.7%649 W · 772 L-9.2wins-0.01per pick46cpaid-18.2%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x2652…2a1dbacked Yes76c25$19 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$18.961,01853.1%541 W · 477 L-24.8wins-0.02per pick56cpaid-9.8%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0x4703…58eebacked No66c20.8$14 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$7.072100%2 W · 0 L+0.7wins+0.37per pick63cpaid+57.7%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0xa94b…925fbacked No67c20.15$13 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.652100%2 W · 0 L+0.9wins+0.44per pick56cpaid+83.3%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0x9b89…99e2backed No66c18.18$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.1830749.2%151 W · 156 L+0.7wins0.00per pick49cpaid-1.3%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xf917…0482backed No67c18.12$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.981100%1 W · 0 L+0.3wins+0.33per pick67cpaid+49.3%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xe8bc…e371backed No68c17.43$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.58250%1 W · 1 L0.0wins0.00per pick50cpaid-26.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in La Liga and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 3 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.