TailMyPicks
Menu
Check another

Wallet 0x4cb2…2f41

Rebuilt .

Tailer profilescored on resolved markets · held to resolution

$235 staked over 17 qualified picks in 2 Categories 1 of 2 below 50.

63

Best Category

Tennis

$210 staked over 15 qualified picks

Above the line at +0.12 per pick.

See the full Tennis board
49

Second best

MLB

$25 staked over 2 qualified picks

Below the line at -0.01 per pick — 50 means no edge at all.

See the full MLB board

Record by Category2 Categories

What these columns mean
Weight
The money this wallet put behind its qualified picks in this category — what it actually risked, rather than how many times it had an opinion. Nine hundred one-dollar picks and nine hundred thousand-dollar picks are not the same wallet. It is never added to anything in the live account below: different populations, measured on different days.
Qualified picks
Every Pick this wallet made in this category that is large enough to be a real opinion and cheap enough that a follower could still have realised the edge. Nothing on this site is scored from anything else.
Win rate
The share of this wallet's qualified picks whose outcome won, with the wins and the losses beside it — 62% of eleven and 62% of eleven hundred are not the same claim. Held to resolution: a pick is graded on the market's winning outcome whether or not the wallet sold beforehand. No board is ranked by this: favourites win often.
vs expected
Wins, minus the wins the entry prices already implied. Counted in wins: +8 means eight more than the prices this wallet paid were pricing in. It is the number that separates a forecaster from somebody who bought favourites.
Realizable edge
Per qualified pick: how far this wallet beat the price it paid, once the worse entry price a follower gets is charged against it. The raw edge is what the wallet got; this is what copying it would have got. Edge that vanishes at two cents of slippage was never sellable.
Avg entry
The price this wallet paid, in cents, averaged across its qualified picks and weighted by how much it put on each. Buys only — selling out later does not change it. 88c beside a 90% win rate is a record built on heavy favourites.
ROI per pick
The mean return on one pick, held to resolution, with every pick counted the same regardless of size. That equal weighting is the point: it is what tells a record earned across many picks apart from one carried by a few large ones.
Tail Score
The number a wallet is ranked by in a category: its edge per pick, shrunk toward zero so that a short lucky run cannot outrank a long record, then graded out of 100 on a ruler that never moves. No edge at all grades 50, and a grade screenshotted today still means the same thing in six months. The scale itself is published with the figures it grades; this page holds no copy of it.
Category
WeightThe money this wallet put behind its qualified picks in this category — what it actually risked, rather than how many times it had an opinion. Nine hundred one-dollar picks and nine hundred thousand-dollar picks are not the same wallet. It is never added to anything in the live account below: different populations, measured on different days.
Qualified picksEvery Pick this wallet made in this category that is large enough to be a real opinion and cheap enough that a follower could still have realised the edge. Nothing on this site is scored from anything else.
Win rateThe share of this wallet's qualified picks whose outcome won, with the wins and the losses beside it — 62% of eleven and 62% of eleven hundred are not the same claim. Held to resolution: a pick is graded on the market's winning outcome whether or not the wallet sold beforehand. No board is ranked by this: favourites win often.
vs expectedWins, minus the wins the entry prices already implied. Counted in wins: +8 means eight more than the prices this wallet paid were pricing in. It is the number that separates a forecaster from somebody who bought favourites.
Realizable edgePer qualified pick: how far this wallet beat the price it paid, once the worse entry price a follower gets is charged against it. The raw edge is what the wallet got; this is what copying it would have got. Edge that vanishes at two cents of slippage was never sellable.
Avg entryThe price this wallet paid, in cents, averaged across its qualified picks and weighted by how much it put on each. Buys only — selling out later does not change it. 88c beside a 90% win rate is a record built on heavy favourites.
ROI per pickThe mean return on one pick, held to resolution, with every pick counted the same regardless of size. That equal weighting is the point: it is what tells a record earned across many picks apart from one carried by a few large ones.
Tail ScoreThe number a wallet is ranked by in a category: its edge per pick, shrunk toward zero so that a short lucky run cannot outrank a long record, then graded out of 100 on a ruler that never moves. No edge at all grades 50, and a grade screenshotted today still means the same thing in six months. The scale itself is published with the figures it grades; this page holds no copy of it.
Tennislast resolved Sep 1, 2026, EDT$2101586.7%13 W · 2 L+4.7+0.3156c+67%63
ResolvedMarketPositionResultEntrySizeReturnP/L held
Sep 1, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Martin Damm vs Frances Tiafoeon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Frances TiafoeWon — open this pick on its own page55c$15+81.8%+$12.27
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Yannick Hanfmann vs Alejandro Tabiloon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Alejandro TabiloWon — open this pick on its own page61c$15+63.9%+$9.59
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Dalibor Svrcina vs Valentin Royeron Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Dalibor SvrcinaWon — open this pick on its own page57c$15+75.4%+$11.32
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Matteo Arnaldi vs James Duckworthon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Matteo ArnaldiLost — open this pick on its own page60c$15-100%-$15
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Jurij Rodionov vs Giovanni Mpetshi Perricardon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Jurij RodionovWon — open this pick on its own page54c$15+85.2%+$12.78
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Otto Virtanen vs Andrey Rublevon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Andrey RublevWon — open this pick on its own page54c$15+85.2%+$12.78
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Stefanos Tsitsipas vs Arthur Filson Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Stefanos TsitsipasWon — open this pick on its own page56c$15+78.6%+$11.79
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Thiago Agustin Tirante vs Adrian Mannarinoon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Thiago Agustin TiranteLost — open this pick on its own page60c$15-100%-$15
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Valentin Vacherot vs Aleksandar Kovacevicon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Valentin VacherotWon — open this pick on its own page55c$15+81.8%+$12.27
Aug 31, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Mariano Navone vs Novak Djokovicon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Mariano NavoneWon — open this pick on its own page54c$15+85.2%+$12.78
Aug 30, 2026, EDTUS Open ATP: Miomir Kecmanovic vs Denis Shapovalovon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Denis ShapovalovWon — open this pick on its own page52c$15+92.3%+$13.85
Aug 14, 2026, EDTCincinnati Open: Sebastian Baez vs Grigor Dimitrovon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Sebastian BaezWon — open this pick on its own page25c$15+307%+$46.04
Aug 4, 2026, EDTNational Bank Open: Luciano Darderi vs Gabriel Dialloon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Luciano DarderiWon — open this pick on its own page64c$10+56.3%+$5.63
Aug 4, 2026, EDTNational Bank Open: Elina Svitolina vs Jessica Bouzas Maneiroon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Elina SvitolinaWon — open this pick on its own page64c$10+56.3%+$5.63
Jul 28, 2026, EDTMubadala Citi DC Open: Martin Damm vs Ben Sheltonon Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Ben SheltonWon — open this pick on its own page64c$10+56.3%+$5.63
All 15 picks, newest first.
MLB Inactivelast resolved Aug 1, 2026, EDT$25250%1 W · 1 L-0.2-0.0959c-7.9%49
ResolvedMarketPositionResultEntrySizeReturnP/L held
Aug 1, 2026, EDTBoston Red Sox vs. Los Angeles Dodgerson Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Los Angeles DodgersLost — open this pick on its own page64c$10-100%-$10
Jul 12, 2026, EDTMilwaukee Brewers vs. Pittsburgh Pirateson Polymarket (opens in a new tab)Pittsburgh PiratesWon — open this pick on its own page54c$15+84.1%+$12.62
All 2 picks, newest first.

vs expected is how many more (or fewer) Picks this wallet won than the prices it paid implied it would. It is the column that tells a real edge apart from a record bought by backing favourites. Realizable edge is what that comes to per Pick for somebody copying the wallet, after the cost of getting in behind it. Avg entry is the average price it paid, so a strong record built on heavy favourites shows as one. ROI per pick counts every Pick equally rather than by size, which is how a record earned across many Picks is told apart from one carried by a few large ones. Days are shown in US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in — an American night game settles after midnight UTC, so any other zone would name the day after the one it was played on. Inactive means nothing has resolved in that Category recently. The score is kept and the wallet stays reachable here; it only leaves the default leaderboard.

If you had taileda hypothetical — not a forecast

You’d be +$502.58 tailing 15 Tennis picks (13 W · 2 L) at $50 each — +67% per pick.

A hypothetical, worked out from this wallet’s own qualified Tennis picks and nothing else: $50 on each one, held to resolution, bought at the price the wallet paid plus the 0c of slippage TailMyPicks charges inside its score. It is what those picks did, not what the next one will do, and it is before whatever your venue charges you to trade.

What is a Tail Score?

A mark out of 100, per Category. 50 means no edge at all — this wallet did about what the prices it paid implied it would. Above 50 it beat those prices; below 50 it did worse than them.

The scale does not move. 100 is a wallet beating the prices it paid by 0.45 per pick and 0 is losing to them by the same, on every wallet, on every page, in every month. So a grade you screenshot today still means what it meant when you took it, and two wallets can be put side by side.

Nobody reaches either end. Across every wallet TailMyPicks has scored, the marks run from roughly 5 to 87 — which is what a fixed ruler costs, and what buys the sentence above.

It is not a win rate. A wallet can win four Picks in five and still grade below 50, if the market was already pricing those outcomes at 90c — it paid for the wins rather than finding them. The vs expected and Avg entry columns below are what separate the two.

The mark is deliberately pulled toward 50 when there is little evidence. Three lucky Picks do not produce a high grade; several hundred consistent ones do. So a modest grade on thousands of Picks means something a high grade on twelve does not.

Because it is shrunk this way, a Category grade is a conservative reading. The headline figure for a wallet is its best Category, so it always understates how badly the wallet does in its worst one — which is why the table below is per Category and not one blended number.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80.
  • The position was at least $10.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.