TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Other European Leagues · resolved market

Estoril Praia vs. Gil Vicente FC: O/U 1.5

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Overof Over, Under
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Other European Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$15,829
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$17,558

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $15,829 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Other European Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Other European Leagues
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x204f…5e14backed Under25c10,179$2,536 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2,535.717,88945.4%3,579 W · 4,310 L+11.2wins0.00per pick45cpaid-9.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x2005…75eabacked Over75c9,850$7,404 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$2,445.765,60442%2,356 W · 3,248 L+75.1wins+0.01per pick41cpaid-8.2%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x7ea5…de7bbacked Under23c1,147$261 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$261.162,33446.8%1,093 W · 1,241 L+14.5wins+0.01per pick46cpaid-0.1%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x2039…acddbacked Over78c1,034$804 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$230.33683.3%5 W · 1 L+0.7wins+0.11per pick72cpaid+14.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x6ac5…4b6ebacked Under22c756.81$166 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$166.543546.7%203 W · 232 L-3.0wins-0.01per pick47cpaid-1.8%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x3bc3…0b17backed Over77c645.88$500 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$145.888257.3%47 W · 35 L+6.7wins+0.08per pick49cpaid+26.4%equal weight57+0.06 edge/pick
0xec59…bb35backed Over76c506.24$385 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$121.569061.1%55 W · 35 L+3.7wins+0.04per pick57cpaid+46.7%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0xeb3f…e8a6backed Over77c363.64$280 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$83.642171.4%15 W · 6 L+0.2wins+0.01per pick71cpaid-1.8%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xa237…d59abacked Over77c300$231 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$69560%3 W · 2 L-0.2wins-0.04per pick64cpaid-8.8%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x7b2c…af48backed Under24c299.32$72 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$71.8467050.6%339 W · 331 L+11.6wins+0.02per pick49cpaid-0.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x1d08…2142backed Over77c141.98$109 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$32.667054.3%38 W · 32 L+3.9wins+0.06per pick49cpaid+17%equal weight55+0.04 edge/pick
0x8790…010bbacked Over76c70.48$53 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$17.0813050%65 W · 65 L+10.2wins+0.08per pick42cpaid+17.1%equal weight57+0.07 edge/pick
0xd8d4…3691backed Over77c64.94$50 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$14.943655.6%20 W · 16 L-4.0wins-0.11per pick67cpaid-21%equal weight43-0.07 edge/pick
0x1d94…9100backed Under23c58.43$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$13.441,40129.2%409 W · 992 L-32.2wins-0.02per pick31cpaid-15.4%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0xd610…4c9abacked Over76c50$38 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1221644.4%96 W · 120 L+2.3wins+0.01per pick43cpaid+5.6%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x397e…3d84backed Over77c35.27$27 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$8.1186960.4%525 W · 344 L+91.3wins+0.11per pick50cpaid+35.6%equal weight61+0.10 edge/pick
0xbcd6…a082backed Over77c29.87$23 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.872564%16 W · 9 L-1.3wins-0.05per pick69cpaid-9%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x6894…59d8backed Over76c26.58$20 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.384168.3%28 W · 13 L-1.6wins-0.04per pick72cpaid-7.9%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0xea9b…2be5backed Over75c20.12$15 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.032433.3%8 W · 16 L-5.1wins-0.21per pick55cpaid-49.7%equal weight38-0.10 edge/pick
0x7f02…12f5backed Over77c20$15 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$4.68055%44 W · 36 L+6.8wins+0.08per pick47cpaid+32.3%equal weight57+0.06 edge/pick
0x6f6f…5a01backed Over73c16.5$12 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$4.452085%17 W · 3 L+2.3wins+0.12per pick73cpaid+16.7%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Other European Leagues and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.