Cricket · resolved market
ILT20: Sharjah Warriorz vs Gulf Giants (Game 1)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x1ce8e125c27c74ca90f09d4e057fc9954fbf342ec2acf8286b21a8ba8b4ae50b
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Sharjah Warriorzof Sharjah Warriorz, Gulf Giants
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Cricketevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $13,325
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $13,208
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $13,325 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 27 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Cricket is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Cricket | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x6c54…da75backed Gulf Giants | 50c | 3,156$1,573 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,573.09 | 109 | 53.2%58 W · 51 L | +3.7wins | +0.03per pick | 50cpaid | +10.9%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6b7c…5f83backed Gulf Giants | 39c | 2,733$1,060 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$1,060.4 | 330 | 42.4%140 W · 190 L | +0.4wins | 0.00per pick | 42cpaid | -11%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x972b…78babacked Gulf Giants | 46c | 716.79$329 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$328.62 | 763 | 51.6%394 W · 369 L | +29.9wins | +0.04per pick | 48cpaid | -7.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x5e7a…500cbacked Sharjah Warriorz | 65c | 458.47$300 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$158.49 | 237 | 54.4%129 W · 108 L | +11.1wins | +0.05per pick | 50cpaid | +5.5%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x41cc…26eabacked Sharjah Warriorz | 37c | 405$150 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$255.15 | 37 | 21.6%8 W · 29 L | -6.2wins | -0.17per pick | 39cpaid | -47%equal weight | 39-0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x4fd9…a49ebacked Sharjah Warriorz | 43c | 250$109 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$141.5 | 118 | 39.8%47 W · 71 L | -4.6wins | -0.04per pick | 44cpaid | -20.1%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x3d83…b76bbacked Gulf Giants | 5c | 232.4$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.62 | 3 | 0%0 W · 3 L | -0.2wins | -0.07per pick | 7cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb7a1…e821backed Sharjah Warriorz | 63c | 224.57$141 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$83.09 | 235 | 55.3%130 W · 105 L | +13.2wins | +0.06per pick | 50cpaid | +6.6%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x1feb…bdc1backed Gulf Giants | 5c | 200$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.1wins | -0.05per pick | 5cpaid | -100%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xd8d8…11babacked Sharjah Warriorz | 48c | 155.82$75 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$80.45 | 126 | 34.1%43 W · 83 L | -0.6wins | -0.01per pick | 35cpaid | -10.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x4690…94fbbacked Sharjah Warriorz | 79c | 143.24$113 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$30.37 | 151 | 51.7%78 W · 73 L | +1.8wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -0.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x34fa…f491backed Gulf Giants | 54c | 100$54 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$54 | 37 | 37.8%14 W · 23 L | -3.7wins | -0.10per pick | 48cpaid | -22.6%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x0512…1c32backed Sharjah Warriorz | 46c | 100$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$54 | 2 | 100%2 W · 0 L | +0.8wins | +0.39per pick | 61cpaid | +74.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x8d88…1e28backed Sharjah Warriorz | 50c | 97$49 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$48.5 | 26 | 26.9%7 W · 19 L | -1.1wins | -0.04per pick | 31cpaid | -23.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdb0b…e2a3backed Gulf Giants | 60c | 83.48$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 139 | 21.6%30 W · 109 L | -14.6wins | -0.10per pick | 32cpaid | -41%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xaada…5e99backed Gulf Giants | 62c | 79$49 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$48.98 | 17 | 11.8%2 W · 15 L | -2.8wins | -0.16per pick | 28cpaid | -44.1%equal weight | 43-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x34cf…6ca4backed Gulf Giants | 62c | 60$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$37.2 | 3 | 0%0 W · 3 L | -1.0wins | -0.35per pick | 35cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xfd47…8277backed Gulf Giants | 63c | 56.95$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35.85 | 9 | 44.4%4 W · 5 L | -1.9wins | -0.21per pick | 65cpaid | -30.7%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x4b28…02dbbacked Gulf Giants | 63c | 47.62$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 6 | 50%3 W · 3 L | -0.8wins | -0.13per pick | 63cpaid | -18.6%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xbe28…3c60backed Sharjah Warriorz | 47c | 42.15$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.15 | 198 | 43.4%86 W · 112 L | -3.7wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa1ed…d964backed Gulf Giants | 62c | 40$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$24.8 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.9wins | -0.44per pick | 44cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5098…1948backed Sharjah Warriorz | 37c | 34.48$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.72 | 20 | 30%6 W · 14 L | -1.6wins | -0.08per pick | 38cpaid | -46.6%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x263f…c744backed Sharjah Warriorz | 40c | 31.21$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.73 | 130 | 40.8%53 W · 77 L | +3.7wins | +0.03per pick | 38cpaid | +8.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa4bd…e8a2backed Sharjah Warriorz | 50c | 30$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15 | 106 | 44.3%47 W · 59 L | -0.9wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -20.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xb469…9e8fbacked Gulf Giants | 60c | 30$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18 | 148 | 53.4%79 W · 69 L | +1.0wins | +0.01per pick | 53cpaid | -0.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x00eb…9b07backed Sharjah Warriorz | 54c | 22.67$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10.43 | 12 | 25%3 W · 9 L | -0.4wins | -0.03per pick | 28cpaid | +2.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2294…4cd3backed Gulf Giants | 54c | 19.83$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.72 | 679 | 31.4%213 W · 466 L | +5.4wins | +0.01per pick | 31cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Cricket and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.