TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Tennis · resolved market

ITF Tokyo: Ikumi Yamazaki vs Nao Nishino

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Ikumi Yamazakiof Ikumi Yamazaki, Nao Nishino
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$29,319
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$35,637

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $29,319 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 33 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Tennis
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x6982…a165backed Ikumi Yamazaki32c8,774$2,804 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5,969.8162956.9%358 W · 271 L+0.8wins0.00per pick57cpaid+2.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xcc92…649dbacked Nao Nishino21c5,207$1,100 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1,1009118.7%17 W · 74 L-5.6wins-0.06per pick25cpaid-30.9%equal weight45-0.05 edge/pick
0xa9f5…937fbacked Nao Nishino70c2,531$1,774 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1,774.264,60248.3%2,223 W · 2,379 L+34.4wins+0.01per pick48cpaid-8.6%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xce9d…3c05backed Nao Nishino46c1,564$720 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$7201,61550.6%817 W · 798 L-17.7wins-0.01per pick52cpaid-5.3%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x0284…97f6backed Nao Nishino53c1,150$615 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$614.768461.9%52 W · 32 L+0.9wins+0.01per pick61cpaid+0.6%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xc07d…b1dfbacked Nao Nishino49c929.62$452 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$451.592,38355.6%1,326 W · 1,057 L+49.3wins+0.02per pick54cpaid-5.2%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xda77…683fbacked Nao Nishino71c905.73$646 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$646.065,41648.6%2,633 W · 2,783 L+14.5wins0.00per pick48cpaid-9.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x0d2d…7ff5backed Nao Nishino67c634.73$425 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$424.538,50542.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L-166.3wins-0.02per pick45cpaid-21.3%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x7547…d158backed Ikumi Yamazaki47c600$282 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$3187,04939.7%2,795 W · 4,254 L-20.5wins0.00per pick40cpaid+0.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xf5ae…3e6cbacked Nao Nishino58c500$289 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$28911141.4%46 W · 65 L+3.3wins+0.03per pick39cpaid+2.8%equal weight53+0.02 edge/pick
0x7002…395cbacked Ikumi Yamazaki69c405.64$278 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$127.2422252.7%117 W · 105 L+4.0wins+0.02per pick51cpaid+5.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xcbbc…2b70backed Nao Nishino56c367.49$204 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$204.1239941.9%167 W · 232 L+13.6wins+0.03per pick38cpaid+3.4%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0xd034…eecebacked Ikumi Yamazaki46c362.92$168 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$194.982,73534%931 W · 1,804 L-13.2wins0.00per pick35cpaid-2.8%equal weight490.00 edge/pick
0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Nao Nishino70c321.47$226 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$225.987,81650.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L+95.4wins+0.01per pick49cpaid-4.6%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x90bb…531fbacked Nao Nishino59c300$177 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$17719941.7%83 W · 116 L+12.3wins+0.06per pick36cpaid+5.6%equal weight56+0.06 edge/pick
0xeda0…7dffbacked Ikumi Yamazaki31c293.6$91 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$202.6932031.3%100 W · 220 L-9.9wins-0.03per pick34cpaid-15.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x9086…4d46backed Nao Nishino72c244.99$177 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$177.411,84148.5%892 W · 949 L-32.0wins-0.02per pick50cpaid-3.8%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x3a72…0a38backed Nao Nishino59c193$114 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$114.4345235.8%162 W · 290 L+6.8wins+0.02per pick34cpaid-5.5%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0x9ca2…088ebacked Nao Nishino59c193$114 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$114.4319744.7%88 W · 109 L+17.8wins+0.09per pick36cpaid+18.1%equal weight59+0.08 edge/pick
0x6318…46b1backed Ikumi Yamazaki45c174.2$79 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$95.155,26128.8%1,514 W · 3,747 L-19.4wins0.00per pick29cpaid-1.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x00d4…4c46backed Nao Nishino55c156$86 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$86.3648235.9%173 W · 309 L+7.0wins+0.01per pick34cpaid-8.8%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0x99f7…1a59backed Nao Nishino55c156$86 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$86.3669438%264 W · 430 L+21.0wins+0.03per pick35cpaid-2.4%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x300d…780dbacked Nao Nishino56c147.57$82 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$82.0618132.6%59 W · 122 L-2.5wins-0.01per pick34cpaid-16.9%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x73fc…9af9backed Nao Nishino66c75.76$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$501656.3%9 W · 7 L-0.5wins-0.03per pick59cpaid-6.1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x6200…7d23backed Ikumi Yamazaki20c64.9$13 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$51.927450%37 W · 37 L+4.7wins+0.06per pick44cpaid+15.8%equal weight55+0.05 edge/pick
0x8711…d2d0backed Ikumi Yamazaki28c60.71$17 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$43.7143358.4%253 W · 180 L+6.4wins+0.01per pick57cpaid+0.6%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0x77de…e67abacked Nao Nishino64c46.68$30 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$30.0162549.6%310 W · 315 L-4.8wins-0.01per pick50cpaid-3.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xc9ec…aa22backed Nao Nishino44c43.06$19 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$18.953033.3%10 W · 20 L+4.9wins+0.16per pick17cpaid+27.2%equal weight60+0.09 edge/pick
0xa2c0…fad2backed Nao Nishino44c43.06$19 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$18.952740.7%11 W · 16 L+5.3wins+0.19per pick21cpaid+74.6%equal weight61+0.10 edge/pick
0xdd3b…cea6backed Nao Nishino57c35$20 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$19.958365.1%54 W · 29 L+1.9wins+0.02per pick63cpaid+6.6%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x1cdd…e595backed Ikumi Yamazaki45c31.54$14 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$17.51,87016%299 W · 1,571 L-314.3wins-0.17per pick33cpaid-65.6%equal weight32-0.17 edge/pick
0x8951…dfcfbacked Ikumi Yamazaki45c25$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$13.7525858.1%150 W · 108 L-3.1wins-0.01per pick59cpaid+1.1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x985d…33c9backed Ikumi Yamazaki46c21.75$10 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$11.751,30036.9%480 W · 820 L-34.2wins-0.03per pick40cpaid-4.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.