Premier League · resolved market
Oxford United FC vs. Queens Park Rangers FC: O/U 1.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x63981cf9d5b9178d9e39295791749de5d8cd05b720b78793ceae341d17c68e42
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,378
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,082
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,378 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Premier League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Under | 76c | 1,940$1,479 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$461.24 | 6,117 | 45.8%2,803 W · 3,314 L | -28.6wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -12.4%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0xcf00…353fbacked Over | 9c | 1,000$90 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$90 | 95 | 32.6%31 W · 64 L | -0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 33cpaid | -25.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x854d…deb0backed Over | 27c | 1,000$270 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$270 | 39 | 53.8%21 W · 18 L | +5.1wins | +0.13per pick | 41cpaid | +38.3%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x4133…5e70backed Under | 43c | 466.9$200 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$266.52 | 2,661 | 45.5%1,210 W · 1,451 L | -11.1wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -9.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x20ad…307dbacked Over | 65c | 461.54$300 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$300 | 48 | 62.5%30 W · 18 L | +2.0wins | +0.04per pick | 58cpaid | +3.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Over | 38c | 398.87$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$149.75 | 4,744 | 41.8%1,983 W · 2,761 L | +28.2wins | +0.01per pick | 41cpaid | -14.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6c0b…43cbbacked Under | 30c | 290.99$89 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$202.34 | 222 | 29.3%65 W · 157 L | +4.0wins | +0.02per pick | 27cpaid | +6.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xc385…8eb0backed Over | 69c | 217.39$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$150 | 42 | 47.6%20 W · 22 L | -3.0wins | -0.07per pick | 55cpaid | -12.6%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xaab6…607ebacked Over | 69c | 199.99$139 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$138.99 | 396 | 51.5%204 W · 192 L | -7.1wins | -0.02per pick | 53cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x649a…02afbacked Over | 70c | 100$70 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$70 | 61 | 68.9%42 W · 19 L | -2.4wins | -0.04per pick | 73cpaid | -7.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xdc1d…f32cbacked Over | 56c | 35.72$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 60 | 56.7%34 W · 26 L | -0.5wins | -0.01per pick | 58cpaid | -6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4cc7…b90dbacked Over | 39c | 31.49$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.28 | 102 | 44.1%45 W · 57 L | +4.7wins | +0.05per pick | 40cpaid | +32%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x1dbf…6631backed Under | 69c | 21.07$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.54 | 35 | 28.6%10 W · 25 L | -4.7wins | -0.13per pick | 42cpaid | -50.4%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x7dfd…8476backed Under | 77c | 19.16$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.41 | 12 | 75%9 W · 3 L | +2.3wins | +0.19per pick | 56cpaid | +39.2%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xa66f…f5a3backed Over | 68c | 15$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.2 | 410 | 40.5%166 W · 244 L | -0.2wins | 0.00per pick | 41cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x2652…2a1dbacked Under | 75c | 13.94$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$3.53 | 1,272 | 50.4%641 W · 631 L | -53.9wins | -0.04per pick | 55cpaid | -12.3%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 6 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Oxford United FC vs. Queens Park Rangers FC: O/U 1.5this page
- Oxford United FC vs. Queens Park Rangers FC: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- Oxford United FC vs. Queens Park Rangers FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- Oxford United FC vs. Queens Park Rangers FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- Oxford United FC vs. Queens Park Rangers FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Queens Park Rangers FC (-1.5)Oxford United FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.