World Politics · resolved market
Will Keir Starmer say "Liz" or "Truss" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x7a71bc53bab5271190ede87dfd3bbdcc7100d48e76d328c64d0506391a2d926b
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- World Politicsevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $633
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $693
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $633 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 12 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in World Politics is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in World Politics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x9240…a7c7backed Yes | 36c | 124.99$45 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$80.35 | 13 | 46.2%6 W · 7 L | +0.5wins | +0.04per pick | 42cpaid | -4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x79f4…4afbbacked Yes | 31c | 88.17$27 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$60.84 | 37 | 18.9%7 W · 30 L | +0.6wins | +0.02per pick | 17cpaid | +14.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf343…793cbacked No | 65c | 60$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39 | 24 | 50%12 W · 12 L | -1.7wins | -0.07per pick | 57cpaid | -12.3%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xaec3…22dfbacked No | 68c | 58.4$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 25 | 28%7 W · 18 L | -4.5wins | -0.18per pick | 46cpaid | -48.3%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xf920…4d4ebacked No | 69c | 58.04$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$40 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.3wins | +0.09per pick | 58cpaid | +29.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7c49…221abacked No | 62c | 40$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$24.8 | 13 | 30.8%4 W · 9 L | -1.8wins | -0.14per pick | 45cpaid | -27.8%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x2162…9287backed No | 66c | 30.51$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -1.1wins | -0.53per pick | 53cpaid | -100%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x9317…1c8fbacked No | 64c | 29.6$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.84 | 3 | 33.3%1 W · 2 L | -0.8wins | -0.26per pick | 59cpaid | -40.5%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x6fa2…8639backed No | 70c | 28.76$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.7wins | -0.70per pick | 70cpaid | -100%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa63c…b262backed Yes | 38c | 26.63$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.62 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.6wins | +0.22per pick | 45cpaid | +57%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x3790…c6a8backed No | 70c | 20$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14 | 8 | 50%4 W · 4 L | +1.1wins | +0.13per pick | 37cpaid | +22%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0816…377abacked No | 60c | 17.81$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.69 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | -0.4wins | -0.19per pick | 69cpaid | -35.9%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in World Politics and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 10 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Will Keir Starmer say "Liz" or "Truss" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?this page
- Will Keir Starmer say "Christmas" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?Yes won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Mr Speaker" 25+ times during the next Prime Minister's Questions?Yes won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Putin" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?Yes won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Reform" 4+ times during the next Prime Minister's Questions?Yes won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Russia" or Russian" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?No won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Scotland" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?No won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Thousand" or "Million" or "Billion" 15+ times during the next Prime Minister's QuestionsYes won
- Will Keir Starmer say "Trump" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?Yes won
- Will Keir Starmer say "United Kingdom" during the next Prime Minister's Questions?No won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.