Valorant · resolved market
Valorant: No Salary Peek vs Yi-Jing (BO3) - VCL Pacific: Last Chance Qualifier Playoffs
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x9076f52c9825c329182214ff1d4f8afc684ce06b9f29973bfae8015970f28f91
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yi-Jingof No Salary Peek, Yi-Jing
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Valorantevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,219
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,328
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,219 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 17 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Valorant is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Valorant | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x8a3d…13dabacked No Salary Peek | 31c | 845.76$260 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$260.16 | 23 | 30.4%7 W · 16 L | -1.8wins | -0.08per pick | 38cpaid | -11.4%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc33d…0d40backed Yi-Jing | 69c | 610.53$420 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$190.24 | 418 | 35.6%149 W · 269 L | -19.8wins | -0.05per pick | 40cpaid | -32.7%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Yi-Jing | 67c | 424.6$285 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$139.63 | 851 | 38.1%324 W · 527 L | -51.4wins | -0.06per pick | 44cpaid | -24.6%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x67af…61eebacked Yi-Jing | 69c | 408.99$281 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$127.52 | 969 | 45%436 W · 533 L | -19.9wins | -0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -14.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfe9b…cbe5backed No Salary Peek | 36c | 254.17$91 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$91 | 64 | 37.5%24 W · 40 L | -4.0wins | -0.06per pick | 44cpaid | -14.7%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x35f0…971ebacked No Salary Peek | 31c | 133$41 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$41.23 | 19 | 47.4%9 W · 10 L | +1.3wins | +0.07per pick | 40cpaid | +13.3%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x7c8c…2d81backed Yi-Jing | 69c | 108.93$75 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.85 | 146 | 45.2%66 W · 80 L | -6.6wins | -0.04per pick | 50cpaid | -14.5%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x4ed5…100dbacked No Salary Peek | 32c | 104.71$33 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$33 | 3 | 66.7%2 W · 1 L | +0.5wins | +0.16per pick | 51cpaid | +19.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5151…645cbacked No Salary Peek | 35c | 60$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21 | 39 | 38.5%15 W · 24 L | -1.7wins | -0.04per pick | 43cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x1c55…84cebacked No Salary Peek | 31c | 59.99$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.7 | 150 | 42%63 W · 87 L | -4.4wins | -0.03per pick | 45cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1982…bc7bbacked Yi-Jing | 78c | 59$46 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.13 | 91 | 42.9%39 W · 52 L | -3.7wins | -0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x5210…bd53backed No Salary Peek | 32c | 46.18$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.68 | 672 | 50.6%340 W · 332 L | -5.7wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -2.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3f85…e91abacked Yi-Jing | 68c | 44.11$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.12 | 130 | 43.8%57 W · 73 L | -1.6wins | -0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -6.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4ff7…4176backed No Salary Peek | 30c | 39$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.7 | 9 | 33.3%3 W · 6 L | -0.8wins | -0.09per pick | 43cpaid | -20.8%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe881…19abbacked No Salary Peek | 41c | 37.97$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.57 | 27 | 33.3%9 W · 18 L | -2.1wins | -0.08per pick | 41cpaid | -24.6%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x58cc…6415backed No Salary Peek | 30c | 36$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.8 | 6 | 66.7%4 W · 2 L | +0.8wins | +0.14per pick | 53cpaid | +17.5%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd668…bf2dbacked Yi-Jing | 70c | 16.67$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5 | 4 | 50%2 W · 2 L | -0.3wins | -0.07per pick | 57cpaid | -22.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Valorant and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.