TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Tennis · resolved market

Set Handicap: Humbert (-1.5) vs Martin (+1.5)

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Humbertof Humbert, Martin
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$5,026
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$5,292

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $5,026 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Tennis
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x6d3c…d294backed Humbert54c1,983$1,061 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$921.832,30451.1%1,177 W · 1,127 L+10.4wins0.00per pick51cpaid0%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x3663…8950backed Martin46c1,861$863 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$863.0139043.6%170 W · 220 L+21.8wins+0.06per pick38cpaid+11.6%equal weight56+0.05 edge/pick
0x3e04…564dbacked Humbert56c1,425$795 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$629.7917145%77 W · 94 L-3.7wins-0.02per pick47cpaid-5.4%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x49e0…9af1backed Humbert56c535.71$300 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$235.7111064.5%71 W · 39 L-1.3wins-0.01per pick66cpaid-0.2%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xff34…bf20backed Martin30c268.22$80 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$809324.7%23 W · 70 L-6.2wins-0.07per pick31cpaid-25.1%equal weight44-0.05 edge/pick
0x7a5d…54dbbacked Humbert70c263.22$184 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$78.82,39950.6%1,215 W · 1,184 L+76.0wins+0.03per pick47cpaid-3.7%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x5465…8b19backed Humbert56c247.48$139 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$108.895046%23 W · 27 L+1.0wins+0.02per pick44cpaid+4.3%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0xa3ae…d117backed Martin44c166.07$72 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$72.412737%10 W · 17 L-1.7wins-0.06per pick43cpaid-16%equal weight46-0.03 edge/pick
0x99f0…9495backed Martin42c160.25$67 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$66.532,13736.8%787 W · 1,350 L+37.9wins+0.02per pick35cpaid+6.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x5b63…11a4backed Humbert54c108.82$59 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$50.064,87541.5%2,023 W · 2,852 L-77.1wins-0.02per pick43cpaid-15.1%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x15bc…4a7ebacked Martin47c106.99$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$50.2914848.6%72 W · 76 L+4.1wins+0.03per pick46cpaid+9%equal weight53+0.02 edge/pick
0x076d…8d4cbacked Humbert59c103.22$61 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$42.044,15952.8%2,198 W · 1,961 L+66.8wins+0.02per pick51cpaid-1.1%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xec17…0af9backed Martin47c94.98$45 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$44.6412639.7%50 W · 76 L-0.1wins0.00per pick40cpaid-6.2%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xd78e…6421backed Martin46c89.31$41 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$41.2393557.3%536 W · 399 L-12.4wins-0.01per pick59cpaid-2.1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xc7f7…2abfbacked Humbert53c68$36 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$31.9673048.8%356 W · 374 L-18.5wins-0.03per pick51cpaid-7.2%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0x2160…bcb3backed Humbert57c66.07$38 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$28.4141544.3%184 W · 231 L-1.8wins0.00per pick45cpaid-2.4%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x17f5…f087backed Humbert57c55.33$32 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$23.7917458%101 W · 73 L+5.4wins+0.03per pick55cpaid+5%equal weight53+0.03 edge/pick
0x298f…b4e1backed Martin47c53.17$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$24.994153.7%22 W · 19 L+1.1wins+0.03per pick51cpaid+9%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xd85a…9143backed Martin47c35.98$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$16.911838.9%7 W · 11 L-0.1wins-0.01per pick40cpaid-12%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xcb6b…604ebacked Martin46c33$15 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$15.1811839%46 W · 72 L-2.7wins-0.02per pick41cpaid-8.7%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x12b3…e104backed Martin47c31.66$15 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$14.8811837.3%44 W · 74 L-3.9wins-0.03per pick41cpaid-14.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.

The rest of this event

Polymarket sells these questions together. 3 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.