Asian League · resolved market
Beijing Guoan FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 1.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xc1550e3a7927847d0124cae8bc64f29f526808dd5e097e8c6a2f191bd3ef9c86
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- Polymarket published no figure
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $11,134
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $11,134 — TailMyPicks’s own total, because the venue published none.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Under | 18c | 1,385$256 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$255.75 | 2,522 | 42.3%1,067 W · 1,455 L | +54.6wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -5.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x8d88…1e28backed Under | 8c | 900.53$72 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$72.02 | 105 | 22.9%24 W · 81 L | -7.4wins | -0.07per pick | 30cpaid | -29.4%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x8349…7c12backed Under | 19c | 787.87$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$149.7 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -37.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x20ad…a7c6backed Under | 24c | 701.86$166 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$166.03 | 194 | 36.6%71 W · 123 L | +1.2wins | +0.01per pick | 36cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5a42…f13abacked Under | 19c | 679.97$129 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$129.19 | 1 | 0%0 W · 1 L | -0.2wins | -0.19per pick | 19cpaid | -100%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1f62…76f6backed Under | 14c | 283.55$40 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.68 | 1,117 | 46.2%516 W · 601 L | -7.8wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd01c…7f9dbacked Under | 14c | 198.96$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27.85 | 934 | 46.1%431 W · 503 L | +6.7wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -3.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x76ac…ef3bbacked Under | 18c | 190.84$34 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$34.35 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.4wins | -0.20per pick | 20cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2de6…e187backed Under | 28c | 167.82$47 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.48 | 16 | 56.3%9 W · 7 L | +2.1wins | +0.13per pick | 43cpaid | +101.1%equal weight | 56+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x5a22…c3b5backed Under | 33c | 151.67$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 42 | 26.2%11 W · 31 L | -0.8wins | -0.02per pick | 28cpaid | -21.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1155…2315backed Over | 78c | 100$78 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22 | 64 | 79.7%51 W · 13 L | +6.7wins | +0.10per pick | 69cpaid | +16.4%equal weight | 58+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x9532…8315backed Under | 22c | 64.22$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.27 | 2 | 0%0 W · 2 L | -0.4wins | -0.21per pick | 21cpaid | -100%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x380c…1099backed Over | 78c | 30$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.6 | 83 | 63.9%53 W · 30 L | +1.3wins | +0.02per pick | 62cpaid | -0.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x02a4…955bbacked Over | 79c | 25.14$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.16 | 9 | 77.8%7 W · 2 L | +1.6wins | +0.18per pick | 60cpaid | +36.3%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x781d…201bbacked Over | 80c | 25$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5 | 8 | 62.5%5 W · 3 L | +1.9wins | +0.23per pick | 39cpaid | +102.5%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x2654…b45fbacked Over | 62c | 23.84$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.95 | 51 | 62.7%32 W · 19 L | +3.5wins | +0.07per pick | 56cpaid | +3.1%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Beijing Guoan FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 1.5this page
- Beijing Guoan FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: Both Teams to ScoreYes won
- Beijing Guoan FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 2.5Under won
- Beijing Guoan FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- Beijing Guoan FC vs. Shanghai Shenhua FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Beijing Guoan FC (-1.5)Shanghai Shenhua FC won
- Spread: Beijing Guoan FC (-2.5)Shanghai Shenhua FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.