Valorant · resolved market
Valorant: Sharper Esport vs ONSIDE GAMING - Map 2 Winner
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xcc7be13de7ce7a22d573a396bbfbfd0c84b08fe225d9ef83d3304618b652b9fe
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- ONSIDE GAMINGof Sharper Esport, ONSIDE GAMING
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Valorantevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,441
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,464
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,441 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Valorant is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Valorant | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xfdc0…4b85backed Sharper Esport | 55c | 918.89$501 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$501.07 | 931 | 48.1%448 W · 483 L | -11.0wins | -0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -8.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x91a2…e415backed ONSIDE GAMING | 44c | 716.06$315 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$400.99 | 53 | 56.6%30 W · 23 L | +4.7wins | +0.09per pick | 48cpaid | +16.6%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xa5cf…8cc5backed ONSIDE GAMING | 56c | 268.44$152 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$116.91 | 285 | 41.1%117 W · 168 L | -6.6wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x21ed…1ea1backed ONSIDE GAMING | 49c | 219.22$107 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$111.8 | 83 | 47%39 W · 44 L | -0.1wins | 0.00per pick | 47cpaid | +1.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x904e…0becbacked ONSIDE GAMING | 70c | 107.51$75 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$32.55 | 1,608 | 45.2%727 W · 881 L | -24.0wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -22.6%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf1ee…519cbacked Sharper Esport | 46c | 79.32$37 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36.81 | 1,247 | 49.6%619 W · 628 L | -2.6wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked ONSIDE GAMING | 52c | 70.53$37 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.6 | 1,376 | 47.1%648 W · 728 L | +10.6wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -6.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe32a…cd33backed ONSIDE GAMING | 58c | 55.69$32 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23.65 | 430 | 59.8%257 W · 173 L | +12.4wins | +0.03per pick | 57cpaid | +5.6%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xa951…8a2fbacked Sharper Esport | 49c | 48$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.52 | 321 | 57.6%185 W · 136 L | +7.6wins | +0.02per pick | 55cpaid | -1.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4713…4d21backed Sharper Esport | 24c | 42$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.25 | 811 | 34.9%283 W · 528 L | -60.9wins | -0.08per pick | 42cpaid | -34.2%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xca5f…41f5backed Sharper Esport | 57c | 41.15$24 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.53 | 64 | 57.8%37 W · 27 L | +3.4wins | +0.05per pick | 53cpaid | -0.6%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x9562…fbd4backed Sharper Esport | 57c | 35$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.95 | 44 | 52.3%23 W · 21 L | -0.6wins | -0.01per pick | 54cpaid | -11.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5b55…cbc6backed ONSIDE GAMING | 44c | 33.93$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$19 | 42 | 57.1%24 W · 18 L | +3.0wins | +0.07per pick | 50cpaid | +11%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x505f…645ebacked ONSIDE GAMING | 67c | 30$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.9 | 385 | 48.6%187 W · 198 L | +8.0wins | +0.02per pick | 47cpaid | -2.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x7c8c…2d81backed Sharper Esport | 49c | 25$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.25 | 143 | 45.5%65 W · 78 L | -5.8wins | -0.04per pick | 50cpaid | -13.9%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Valorant and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 3 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Valorant: Sharper Esport vs ONSIDE GAMING - Map 2 Winnerthis page
- Valorant: Sharper Esport vs ONSIDE GAMING (BO3) - VCT Pacific Play-InONSIDE GAMING won
- Valorant: Sharper Esport vs ONSIDE GAMING - Map 1 WinnerSharper Esport won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.