Asian League · resolved market
Al Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xd3f054a35cf85799e650b43dcfe13432a1ecc380a949cfb657183cc2aef1d203
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Noof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Asian Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $5,368
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $5,061
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $5,368 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 22 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Asian League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Asian League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xc291…5d74backed No | 67c | 1,919$1,278 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$641.33 | 2,424 | 38%920 W · 1,504 L | +0.7wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -1.7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x21f5…c161backed Yes | 47c | 1,592$746 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$746 | 88 | 34.1%30 W · 58 L | +0.3wins | 0.00per pick | 34cpaid | +10.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xaebf…e1cabacked Yes | 12c | 1,237$148 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$148.4 | 78 | 32.1%25 W · 53 L | +1.2wins | +0.02per pick | 30cpaid | -6.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed No | 62c | 986.59$613 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$373.51 | 5,946 | 46.1%2,743 W · 3,203 L | +50.5wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | -6.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked No | 58c | 359.79$207 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$152.49 | 2,522 | 42.3%1,067 W · 1,455 L | +54.6wins | +0.02per pick | 40cpaid | -5.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x52d9…fb1abacked No | 80c | 358.16$286 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$72.65 | 892 | 45%401 W · 491 L | -5.6wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -2.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc686…5a55backed Yes | 42c | 357.33$150 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$150 | 285 | 32.3%92 W · 193 L | -2.4wins | -0.01per pick | 33cpaid | -9.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd89a…49a4backed Yes | 13c | 327.71$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44 | 17 | 29.4%5 W · 12 L | -0.8wins | -0.05per pick | 34cpaid | -13.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x14e3…810cbacked Yes | 49c | 204.08$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 52 | 46.2%24 W · 28 L | +0.4wins | +0.01per pick | 45cpaid | +11.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4e61…0e06backed Yes | 27c | 200$53 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$53 | 81 | 19.8%16 W · 65 L | -2.8wins | -0.03per pick | 23cpaid | -8.6%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd0a0…35cdbacked Yes | 60c | 177$106 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$106.2 | 91 | 58.2%53 W · 38 L | +4.1wins | +0.04per pick | 54cpaid | +3.1%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x2a69…d2f7backed No | 41c | 156$64 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$92.04 | 1,647 | 36.2%596 W · 1,051 L | -34.3wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -14.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd81f…6b75backed No | 40c | 106.67$43 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$64 | 399 | 54.6%218 W · 181 L | +16.5wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +5.8%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x5bda…17a8backed Yes | 59c | 100$59 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$59 | 175 | 45.7%80 W · 95 L | -1.0wins | -0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -9.9%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8056…9507backed Yes | 23c | 100$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23 | 12 | 33.3%4 W · 8 L | -1.7wins | -0.14per pick | 48cpaid | -36.2%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xa23f…a64ebacked Yes | 60c | 100$60 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$60 | 26 | 61.5%16 W · 10 L | +2.2wins | +0.08per pick | 53cpaid | +12.5%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x7d0c…a3b7backed Yes | 59c | 61.55$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36.37 | 1,651 | 50.9%840 W · 811 L | +5.8wins | 0.00per pick | 51cpaid | -2.3%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xf9a2…a79abacked No | 40c | 43.33$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26 | 82 | 42.7%35 W · 47 L | +2.2wins | +0.03per pick | 40cpaid | +8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xe569…e759backed Yes | 60c | 33.33$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 34 | 50%17 W · 17 L | +0.2wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x9977…ddb5backed Yes | 32c | 31.25$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10 | 7 | 71.4%5 W · 2 L | +1.3wins | +0.18per pick | 53cpaid | +21.5%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xe5b1…30b2backed Yes | 59c | 29.1$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17.17 | 83 | 47%39 W · 44 L | -1.2wins | -0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x948b…a188backed No | 76c | 24.67$19 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$5.92 | 478 | 60.3%288 W · 190 L | +15.2wins | +0.03per pick | 57cpaid | +4.7%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Asian League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 8 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Al Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Al Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 1.5Over won
- Al Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 2.5Under won
- Al Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 3.5Under won
- Al Hazem SC vs. Al Taawoun Saudi Club: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: Al Hazem SC (-1.5)Al Hazem SC won
- Spread: Al Taawoun Saudi Club (-1.5)Al Hazem SC won
- Spread: Al Taawoun Saudi Club (-2.5)Al Hazem SC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.