TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

Tennis · resolved market

ITF Rancho Santa Fe: Amy Lee vs Misa Malkin

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Misa Malkinof Amy Lee, Misa Malkin
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$1,965
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$2,008

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,965 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 22 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in Tennis
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x2005…75eabacked Amy Lee17c386.11$67 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$67.2111,43543.4%4,959 W · 6,476 L+17.8wins0.00per pick43cpaid-20.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x94bb…77eebacked Amy Lee13c153.85$20 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2081933.1%271 W · 548 L-30.1wins-0.04per pick37cpaid-21.7%equal weight46-0.04 edge/pick
0x8bf9…8292backed Misa Malkin72c142.96$103 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$39.7358857.7%339 W · 249 L+20.2wins+0.03per pick54cpaid+8.2%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0xc4fe…601fbacked Misa Malkin76c142.04$107 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$34.586,44946.3%2,987 W · 3,462 L-42.9wins-0.01per pick47cpaid-13%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xd4f9…84f7backed Amy Lee54c120$65 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$64.835349.9%176 W · 177 L-2.3wins-0.01per pick51cpaid-5.5%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xda77…683fbacked Amy Lee14c88$13 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.615,41648.6%2,633 W · 2,783 L+14.5wins0.00per pick48cpaid-9.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x6553…7a71backed Amy Lee36c75.19$27 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$26.91,12551.1%575 W · 550 L-11.2wins-0.01per pick52cpaid-0.8%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x133a…504abacked Misa Malkin46c60$28 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$32.43,42439.1%1,338 W · 2,086 L-12.3wins0.00per pick39cpaid-1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x31e7…fe2abacked Misa Malkin46c60$28 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$32.41,35638.3%520 W · 836 L+2.2wins0.00per pick38cpaid-1.1%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xfb07…e2ccbacked Amy Lee27c50$14 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$13.526441.7%110 W · 154 L+9.4wins+0.04per pick38cpaid+12.5%equal weight54+0.03 edge/pick
0xcdbd…d0dfbacked Amy Lee36c49$18 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$17.5521447.2%101 W · 113 L-6.2wins-0.03per pick50cpaid-9.8%equal weight47-0.03 edge/pick
0x18d8…400bbacked Amy Lee36c48$17 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$17.2834627.7%96 W · 250 L-12.1wins-0.03per pick31cpaid-12%equal weight46-0.03 edge/pick
0x5210…bd53backed Misa Malkin71c42$30 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$12.353,87445.4%1,758 W · 2,116 L-39.6wins-0.01per pick46cpaid-3%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x9f15…bdb3backed Amy Lee30c41.12$12 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$12.481,14941.3%474 W · 675 L+23.6wins+0.02per pick39cpaid+6%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x9271…a28abacked Amy Lee29c40.83$12 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1255241.3%228 W · 324 L-2.1wins0.00per pick42cpaid-1.7%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x53c9…234dbacked Misa Malkin72c25$18 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$78658.1%50 W · 36 L-1.2wins-0.01per pick60cpaid-4%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Misa Malkin64c23.78$15 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$8.567,81650.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L+95.4wins+0.01per pick49cpaid-4.6%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0x42fe…b1d0backed Misa Malkin76c19.09$14 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$4.62466.7%16 W · 8 L-0.5wins-0.02per pick69cpaid-6.2%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x58cc…6415backed Misa Malkin72c17.92$13 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.0211951.3%61 W · 58 L+0.6wins0.00per pick51cpaid-6.9%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x1bef…5f5dbacked Misa Malkin62c17.49$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.5913965.5%91 W · 48 L+9.6wins+0.07per pick59cpaid+7.9%equal weight57+0.06 edge/pick
0x427a…4e18backed Misa Malkin65c17.22$11 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$6.034957.1%28 W · 21 L+1.2wins+0.02per pick55cpaid+1.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0xe24f…614abacked Misa Malkin64c15.63$10 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5.631637.5%6 W · 10 L+0.7wins+0.04per pick33cpaid+2.1%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.