La Liga · resolved market
Real Madrid CF vs. Deportivo Alavés: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xf5a222467acccf42bd4709e7c4532fba9c5f24caab09f0071ba6b1325c1d1dfd
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Overof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- La Ligaevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $952
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,153
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $952 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 11 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in La Liga is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in La Liga | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xf93a…8a46backed Under | 58c | 109.66$64 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$64.11 | 2 | 50%1 W · 1 L | -0.3wins | -0.14per pick | 64cpaid | -27.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x61e4…fb60backed Under | 54c | 100$54 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$54 | 108 | 51.9%56 W · 52 L | +0.9wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1d6a…8bbcbacked Over | 49c | 98.24$48 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$50.01 | 18 | 44.4%8 W · 10 L | +0.2wins | +0.01per pick | 43cpaid | -2.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa0f5…57e2backed Under | 58c | 75.87$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$43.86 | 25 | 52%13 W · 12 L | -2.1wins | -0.08per pick | 60cpaid | -14.8%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x5495…fc8cbacked Over | 46c | 73.54$34 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$39.68 | 7 | 100%7 W · 0 L | +2.5wins | +0.35per pick | 65cpaid | +59.3%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0xd57d…590ebacked Over | 46c | 62.51$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$33.47 | 10 | 50%5 W · 5 L | -0.9wins | -0.09per pick | 59cpaid | -21.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xeb5a…0dc3backed Under | 58c | 50.65$29 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.24 | 14 | 35.7%5 W · 9 L | -2.8wins | -0.20per pick | 56cpaid | -28.2%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x5159…d7aebacked Over | 41c | 37.87$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.35 | 33 | 45.5%15 W · 18 L | -0.5wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +4.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…ba2cbacked Over | 43c | 28.92$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.39 | 30 | 63.3%19 W · 11 L | 0.0wins | 0.00per pick | 63cpaid | +3.6%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x7d38…6f08backed Under | 53c | 21.28$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.28 | 113 | 64.6%73 W · 40 L | +8.3wins | +0.07per pick | 57cpaid | +11.7%equal weight | 57+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x2494…17b3backed Under | 56c | 18.94$11 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.7 | 16 | 62.5%10 W · 6 L | +2.3wins | +0.14per pick | 48cpaid | +46.8%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in La Liga and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.