Premier League · resolved market
Manchester City FC vs. Exeter City FC: Both Teams to Score
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xfb8d29bce3c9e01a9ba3aac3357b5a162ba76c63397ab24e3f43b2fd74e50024
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Yesof Yes, No
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Premier Leagueevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,265
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,610
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,265 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Premier League is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Premier League | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x2005…75eabacked No | 67c | 977.33$657 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$656.53 | 4,744 | 41.8%1,983 W · 2,761 L | +28.2wins | +0.01per pick | 41cpaid | -14.3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Yes | 34c | 856.24$293 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$563.4 | 6,117 | 45.8%2,803 W · 3,314 L | -28.6wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | -12.4%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x3bd8…e1fbbacked No | 77c | 515.26$397 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$397 | 22 | 54.5%12 W · 10 L | -3.1wins | -0.14per pick | 69cpaid | -21.2%equal weight | 43-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x6835…1976backed Yes | 43c | 438$187 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$251.47 | 518 | 47.3%245 W · 273 L | +11.6wins | +0.02per pick | 45cpaid | +11.9%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x908a…ad16backed No | 58c | 208.42$122 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$121.73 | 1,224 | 40%490 W · 734 L | -24.3wins | -0.02per pick | 42cpaid | -15.4%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x4bfc…ce53backed No | 63c | 199.99$126 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$126 | 29 | 48.3%14 W · 15 L | -1.3wins | -0.04per pick | 53cpaid | -8.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa8a1…2974backed Yes | 37c | 186.48$69 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$117.48 | 12 | 41.7%5 W · 7 L | +0.8wins | +0.07per pick | 35cpaid | -10.1%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1d94…9100backed No | 57c | 125$71 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$71.25 | 1,264 | 33.7%426 W · 838 L | +13.1wins | +0.01per pick | 33cpaid | -1.7%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x5e5b…5950backed No | 65c | 102.52$67 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$66.81 | 100 | 51%51 W · 49 L | -1.8wins | -0.02per pick | 53cpaid | -6%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked Yes | 35c | 101.05$35 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$65.82 | 1,934 | 42.4%820 W · 1,114 L | -43.1wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -18%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9731…9b35backed No | 57c | 69$39 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$39.33 | 1,006 | 46.6%469 W · 537 L | -20.5wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -5.7%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1a50…6c6bbacked No | 66c | 62.12$41 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$41 | 83 | 32.5%27 W · 56 L | -11.4wins | -0.14per pick | 46cpaid | -19%equal weight | 38-0.11 edge/pick |
| 0x1db3…ada1backed Yes | 40c | 42$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$25.01 | 93 | 46.2%43 W · 50 L | -8.6wins | -0.09per pick | 56cpaid | -11.1%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x6079…81c6backed No | 57c | 31.58$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18 | 105 | 52.4%55 W · 50 L | +3.1wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +6.8%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb841…3cfbbacked No | 72c | 30$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.6 | 10 | 70%7 W · 3 L | -0.3wins | -0.03per pick | 73cpaid | +2.6%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdbb9…ed8dbacked No | 61c | 30$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$18.3 | 492 | 54.9%270 W · 222 L | +5.4wins | +0.01per pick | 54cpaid | +6.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Premier League and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 5 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Manchester City FC vs. Exeter City FC: Both Teams to Scorethis page
- Manchester City FC vs. Exeter City FC: O/U 2.5Over won
- Manchester City FC vs. Exeter City FC: O/U 3.5Over won
- Manchester City FC vs. Exeter City FC: O/U 4.5Over won
- Spread: Manchester City FC (-3.5)Manchester City FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.