MenuTailMyPicks

Check another

58

Wallet 0x03f7…c0cc

Rebuilt .

Best in NFL1,811 qualified picks$343,437 staked26 of 43 categories below 50first seen Feb 13, 2024, EST

Score by category

The number wallets are ranked by in a category: the wallet's edge per pick, pulled toward zero so a short lucky run can't beat a long record, then graded out of 100 on a scale that never moves. 50 means no edge at all. A score screenshotted today means the same thing in six months. The scale is published with the scores it grades.43 categories, best first

CS2 in detail

45-0.05 edge/pickInactiveSee the full CS2 board
Qualified picksEvery pick this wallet made in this category that is big enough to count as a real opinion, and cheap enough for a follower to still get the edge. Nothing on this site is scored from anything else.
27
Win rateHow often this wallet's qualified picks won, with the wins and losses beside it: 62% of 11 picks is not the same as 62% of 1,100. Every pick is held to the end: it is graded on how the market settled, even if the wallet sold early. No board is ranked by this, because favourites win often.
40.7% 11 W · 16 L
vs expectedWins, minus the wins the prices this wallet paid already implied. +8 means eight more wins than those prices were pricing in. This number tells a forecaster apart from someone who bought favourites.
-2.4
Realizable edgePer qualified pick: how far this wallet beat the price it paid, after charging the worse price a follower gets. Edge is what the wallet got; this is what tailing it would have got. If two cents more a share wipes the edge out, a follower can't use it.
-0.09
Avg entryThe average price this wallet paid, in cents, over its qualified picks, weighted by how much it put on each. Only buys count: selling later does not change it. 88c next to a 90% win rate means a record built on heavy favourites.
50c
ROI per pickThe average return on one pick, held to the end. Every pick counts the same, whatever its size. That is how this column tells a record earned over many picks from one carried by a few large ones.
-28.4%
StakedThe money this wallet put on its qualified picks in this category: what it risked, not how many times it had an opinion. Nine hundred one-dollar picks and nine hundred thousand-dollar picks are not the same wallet. This figure is never added to anything in what this wallet holds right now, below: the two cover different positions, measured on different days.
$4,003
When it betsWhether this wallet bets before the match starts or once it is under way. It shows the share of its qualified picks in this category first bought before the start of play, and the share bought in play, at or after the start. The start is the one Polymarket records: a match's kick-off or, for weather, the start of the day being forecast. An in-play bet is placed while the price is moving, so it is harder to tail in time. This is measured only where play has a start (sports, esports and weather). Under 10 such picks there is no figure, only the count. The figures also show how many picks the shares rest on and how long before or after the start the wallet usually buys: hover them, or open the JSON version of this record.
before 36%in play 64%, over 22 CS2 picks with a start of play; typically bought 32 min after the start
HoldsHow long this wallet usually keeps what it buys here. It is the median, over every pick it has in this category, of the time from its first buy on the side it was judged on until it sold those shares, or until the market settled if it never sold. When it bets says when the wallet got in. This says how long it stayed, and a wallet can be early and gone in six seconds. It counts every pick, not only the qualified ones, on purpose: otherwise a wallet that flips its expensive positions and holds its cheap ones would be judged on the half that flatters it. TO THE END: most of those picks were held until the market settled. RESELLS: most were sold before that, so following it means selling when it sells. Its record here is scored as if every pick were held to the end. UNFOLLOWABLE: under 1 min, the wallet is left out of this category's ranking. Its edge may be real, but nobody could follow it. We can only see a wallet move every fifteen seconds, so a position that lasts six seconds is gone before you hear about it.
4 h 25to the end, median over 30 picks in this category, every pick counted and not only the qualified ones; 3 of them sold before the market settled
At your priceWhat a follower would have made on each qualified pick here, buying the same side 2 minutes after this wallet did, at the market price at that moment. Beside it is the edge: what the wallet made at its own price, on the same picks. The word under it is the share of the edge a follower keeps. A wallet is left out of a category's ranking when a follower who bought the same side 2 minutes later would have kept less than 75% of its edge there. The edge may be real, but the price had moved before anyone following could act. This figure is generous to the wallet: a pick nobody traded in that window counts at the wallet's own price. The word also shows how many picks were measured. Realizable edge is a different figure: it charges every pick the same fixed cost, while this one charges each pick what the market charged.
-0.09no edge, this wallet has no edge here for a follower to keep (measured on 20 of 27 picks; a pick nobody traded within 2 minutes counts at this wallet's own price)
Last settledThe day this wallet’s latest qualified pick in this category settled. Days are in US Eastern time, the time zone Polymarket uses for its markets. An American night game settles after midnight UTC, so any other time zone would show the day after the game. INACTIVE: A wallet becomes inactive in a category once it has missed more than 10 of the days on which something settled there. The score is kept and the wallet keeps its page here. It only leaves the default leaderboard. If it was in the top 50 and its score would still put it there, it still appears in the feed.
Jul 24, 2026, EDT

If you had taileda hypothetical, not a forecast

You’d be -$383.1 tailing 27 CS2 picks (11 W · 16 L) at $50 each: -28.4% per pick.

A hypothetical, built only from this wallet’s own qualified CS2 picks. It puts $50 on each one, held to the end, at the price the wallet paid plus the 0c of slippage TailMyPicks adds in its score. It shows what those picks did, not what the next one will do. It is before any fees you pay where you bet.

CS2 picks

SettledMarketPositionResultEntrySizeReturnP/L held
Jul 24, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Sharks vs FURIA - Map 1 WinnerFURIALost (open this pick on its own page)0c$44-100%-$43.67
Jun 13, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs TheMongolz - Map 2 WinnerTheMongolzLost (open this pick on its own page)51c$51-100%-$51
Jun 13, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs TheMongolz - Map 1 WinnerNatus VincereLost (open this pick on its own page)40c$80-100%-$80
May 16, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Legacy vs GamerLegion (BO3) - IEM Atlanta PlayoffsGamerLegionWon (open this pick on its own page)42c$84+138.1%+$116
Apr 19, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs FURIA (BO3) - IEM Rio PlayoffsTeam FalconsWon (open this pick on its own page)49c$147+104.1%+$153
Apr 18, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs Spirit (BO3) - IEM Rio PlayoffsSpiritWon (open this pick on its own page)62c$217+61.3%+$133
Apr 17, 2026, EDTMap Handicap: VIT (-1.5) vs Natus Vincere (+1.5)Natus VincereLost (open this pick on its own page)50c$100-100%-$100
Apr 17, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Natus Vincere (BO3) - IEM Rio PlayoffsNatus VincereLost (open this pick on its own page)20c$20-100%-$20
Apr 14, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Spirit vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group ATeam FalconsWon (open this pick on its own page)52c$130+92.3%+$120
Apr 14, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Liquid vs 3DMAX (BO3) - IEM Rio Group ALiquidLost (open this pick on its own page)50c$150-100%-$150
Apr 13, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Gentle Mates vs G2 (BO3) - IEM Rio Group AGentle MatesLost (open this pick on its own page)34c$102-100%-$102
Apr 4, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: PARIVISION vs Legacy (BO3) - PGL Bucharest Group StageLegacyLost (open this pick on its own page)53c$159-100%-$159
Mar 29, 2026, EDTWill Vitality win Blast Open Rotterdam 2026? NoLost (open this pick on its own page)30c$40-100%-$39.52
Mar 28, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs PARIVISION (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam PlayoffsNatus VincereWon (open this pick on its own page)56c$152+77.3%+$117.7
Mar 27, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs PARIVISION (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam PlayoffsTeam FalconsLost (open this pick on its own page)57c$218-100%-$218.03
Mar 27, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs TheMongolz (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam PlayoffsAurora GamingWon (open this pick on its own page)50c$100+100%+$100
Mar 27, 2026, EDTCounter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs TheMongolz - Map 1 WinnerAurora GamingWon (open this pick on its own page)54c$115+85%+$97.67
Oct 8, 2025, EDTCounter-Strike: Aurora Gaming vs FaZe (BO3)Aurora GamingLost (open this pick on its own page)52c$104-100%-$104
Oct 8, 2025, EDTCounter-Strike: G2 vs 3DMAX (BO3)G2Lost (open this pick on its own page)58c$145-100%-$145
Sep 7, 2025, EDTWill Vitality win the BLAST Open London 2025 tournament?YesLost (open this pick on its own page)65c$520-100%-$520.23
Sep 1, 2025, EDTBLAST Open: Spirit vs. G2SpiritLost (open this pick on its own page)76c$540-100%-$540.34
Sep 1, 2025, EDTBLAST Open: fnatic vs. M80fnaticLost (open this pick on its own page)51c$127-100%-$127.49
Aug 24, 2025, EDTWill Aurora win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?NoWon (open this pick on its own page)64c$281+55.5%+$156.12
Aug 24, 2025, EDTWill The MongolZ win the 2025 CS2 Esports World Cup Tournament?YesWon (open this pick on its own page)66c$165+51.5%+$85
Aug 24, 2025, EDTEWC Cs2: Vitality vs. FalconsFalconsWon (open this pick on its own page)77c$116+29.9%+$34.5
Showing 25 of 27 picks, newest first.
About this page

What is a Tail Score?

A score out of 100, per category. 50 means no edge at all: this wallet did about as well as the prices it paid said it would. Above 50, it beat those prices. Below 50, it did worse.

The scale never moves. 100 means beating the prices paid by 0.45 per pick, and 0 means losing to them by the same. That holds for every wallet, on every page, every month. So a score you screenshot today keeps its meaning, and any two wallets can be compared.

Nobody reaches either end. Across every wallet TailMyPicks has scored, scores run from about 5 to 87. That is the price of a scale that never moves, and it is why a score keeps its meaning.

It is not a win rate. A wallet can win four picks in five and still score below 50 if the market already priced those outcomes at 90c. It paid for those wins instead of finding them. The vs expected and Avg entry figures of each category tell the two apart.

The score is pulled toward 50 when there is little evidence, on purpose. Three lucky picks do not make a high score. Several hundred consistent ones do. So a modest score over thousands of picks tells you something a high score over twelve does not.

Because of this pull toward 50, a category score is a cautious reading. A wallet’s headline figure is its best category, so it always plays down how badly the wallet does in its worst one. That is why this page scores each category on its own rather than as one blended number.

Not every trade counts. A pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks only scores what a wallet can be judged on: positions held to the end, in markets with enough volume to count, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80.
  • The position was at least $10.
  • The market has settled, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by us, not measured.