Tennis · resolved market
ITF Hurghada: Sara Milanese vs Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x0056894b3b6c85e4a4451586e4428d4b58f5ebe8bbe66c783e3155f41c533b86
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Sara Milaneseof Sara Milanese, Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,702
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,970
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,702 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 25 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x204f…5e14backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 14c | 939.88$128 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$128.34 | 8,217 | 45.5%3,737 W · 4,480 L | +166.6wins | +0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -16.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd218…b5c9backed Sara Milanese | 25c | 550.98$139 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$412.06 | 6,720 | 36.9%2,479 W · 4,241 L | -95.8wins | -0.01per pick | 38cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xdd5e…9040backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 75c | 511$384 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$383.77 | 1,227 | 53.2%653 W · 574 L | -5.2wins | 0.00per pick | 54cpaid | +0.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xd034…eecebacked Sara Milanese | 24c | 360.88$88 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$272.66 | 2,735 | 34%931 W · 1,804 L | -13.2wins | 0.00per pick | 35cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x6318…46b1backed Sara Milanese | 24c | 334.04$80 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$254.05 | 5,261 | 28.8%1,514 W · 3,747 L | -19.4wins | 0.00per pick | 29cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Sara Milanese | 22c | 211.81$47 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$165.17 | 6,449 | 46.3%2,987 W · 3,462 L | -42.9wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -13%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xef29…2f1ebacked Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 76c | 186$142 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$141.78 | 1,111 | 45.3%503 W · 608 L | -35.7wins | -0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -12.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xc398…f446backed Sara Milanese | 40c | 134.73$54 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$80.83 | 960 | 35.4%340 W · 620 L | -40.5wins | -0.04per pick | 40cpaid | -14.6%equal weight | 45-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xc3a2…8ff7backed Sara Milanese | 21c | 126.76$27 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$100.14 | 394 | 43.9%173 W · 221 L | +19.6wins | +0.05per pick | 39cpaid | +19.6%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xfe78…0319backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 79c | 118.24$93 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$93.27 | 8,828 | 36.1%3,190 W · 5,638 L | -193.3wins | -0.02per pick | 38cpaid | -27.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x39e7…61f1backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 72c | 95.61$69 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$68.84 | 37 | 59.5%22 W · 15 L | +1.6wins | +0.04per pick | 55cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x2965…0dedbacked Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 76c | 91.5$70 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$69.54 | 585 | 39.5%231 W · 354 L | -4.5wins | -0.01per pick | 40cpaid | -9.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7179…7d79backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 57c | 91.4$52 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$52.4 | 2,601 | 46.5%1,209 W · 1,392 L | +18.8wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | +0.8%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 60c | 79.63$48 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$47.66 | 8,505 | 42.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L | -166.3wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x36d8…c7c7backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 60c | 69.65$42 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$41.7 | 1,228 | 41.1%505 W · 723 L | +1.8wins | 0.00per pick | 41cpaid | -7.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8c97…5c66backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 57c | 52.63$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 483 | 55.1%266 W · 217 L | +7.4wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | +2.4%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0009…5497backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 41c | 33.83$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.87 | 1,880 | 48.5%912 W · 968 L | +8.8wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0xf504…0111backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 62c | 32.51$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.11 | 1,102 | 56.5%623 W · 479 L | +52.2wins | +0.05per pick | 52cpaid | +4.6%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x6cd3…226ebacked Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 33c | 30.42$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.16 | 234 | 27.4%64 W · 170 L | -40.1wins | -0.17per pick | 44cpaid | -48.5%equal weight | 33-0.15 edge/pick |
| 0x629d…756cbacked Sara Milanese | 39c | 30$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.3 | 2,082 | 52.3%1,088 W · 994 L | +19.0wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -5.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x29a5…a3c4backed Sara Milanese | 42c | 30$13 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$17.4 | 830 | 47%390 W · 440 L | -16.0wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -9.8%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xa578…6702backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 77c | 30$23 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$23.1 | 1,588 | 47%746 W · 842 L | -24.2wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -3.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb868…5e23backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 76c | 25.99$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.75 | 56 | 51.8%29 W · 27 L | -5.2wins | -0.09per pick | 61cpaid | -16.9%equal weight | 43-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 68c | 24.97$17 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16.98 | 7,816 | 50.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L | +95.4wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe907…cff6backed Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz | 80c | 24.09$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.24 | 2,854 | 39.5%1,126 W · 1,728 L | -83.5wins | -0.03per pick | 42cpaid | -22.9%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.