Tennis · resolved market
ITF Alkmaar: Amelie Van Impe vs Celia Anson Sanchez
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x2eed9079745d66493522c04193cabcaea39f586b0dfa4cc9c701776f642660d9
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Amelie Van Impeof Amelie Van Impe, Celia Anson Sanchez
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $10,040
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $11,289
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $10,040 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 24 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xc07d…b1dfbacked Amelie Van Impe | 79c | 4,830$3,824 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$1,006.34 | 2,383 | 55.6%1,326 W · 1,057 L | +49.3wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | -5.2%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x14e7…a32cbacked Celia Anson Sanchez | 21c | 1,315$278 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$278.15 | 1,349 | 49.8%672 W · 677 L | -6.5wins | 0.00per pick | 50cpaid | -7.2%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x775d…6bebbacked Celia Anson Sanchez | 21c | 1,226$254 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$254.3 | 1,767 | 52.1%920 W · 847 L | -2.2wins | 0.00per pick | 52cpaid | -6.1%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x629d…756cbacked Celia Anson Sanchez | 24c | 1,070$255 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$254.99 | 2,082 | 52.3%1,088 W · 994 L | +19.0wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -5.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xddb6…b9b3backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 21c | 493.23$106 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$105.79 | 1,725 | 52.2%901 W · 824 L | -8.0wins | 0.00per pick | 53cpaid | -5.2%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x5c18…2f76backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 20c | 390$79 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$78.5 | 1,822 | 41%747 W · 1,075 L | -30.2wins | -0.02per pick | 43cpaid | -9.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x8a80…11c5backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 31c | 354.62$110 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$109.93 | 739 | 51.7%382 W · 357 L | -4.9wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -6.5%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd6d2…4a24backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 5c | 283.37$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.17 | 529 | 10%53 W · 476 L | -3.9wins | -0.01per pick | 11cpaid | -11.9%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xc4fe…601fbacked Celia Anson Sanchez | 18c | 200.75$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35.87 | 6,449 | 46.3%2,987 W · 3,462 L | -42.9wins | -0.01per pick | 47cpaid | -13%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xe911…3d4ebacked Celia Anson Sanchez | 26c | 136.31$35 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$35.1 | 4,426 | 51.8%2,291 W · 2,135 L | +136.7wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x8649…ba57backed Amelie Van Impe | 52c | 130.19$67 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$62.73 | 796 | 46%366 W · 430 L | +1.3wins | 0.00per pick | 46cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x1cdd…e595backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 33c | 123.59$41 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$41.17 | 1,870 | 16%299 W · 1,571 L | -314.3wins | -0.17per pick | 33cpaid | -65.6%equal weight | 32-0.17 edge/pick |
| 0xa9f5…937fbacked Amelie Van Impe | 68c | 65$44 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$20.54 | 4,602 | 48.3%2,223 W · 2,379 L | +34.4wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -8.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd218…b5c9backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 34c | 57.81$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.53 | 6,720 | 36.9%2,479 W · 4,241 L | -95.8wins | -0.01per pick | 38cpaid | -20.5%equal weight | 48-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xbfd7…f0bfbacked Amelie Van Impe | 77c | 51.98$40 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.8 | 7,816 | 50.6%3,958 W · 3,858 L | +95.4wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -4.6%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x4ffe…9f71backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 23c | 51.98$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.8 | 2,331 | 7.9%183 W · 2,148 L | -56.9wins | -0.02per pick | 10cpaid | -60.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb155…ca84backed Celia Anson Sanchez | 28c | 50$14 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$13.79 | 920 | 46.6%429 W · 491 L | -14.2wins | -0.02per pick | 48cpaid | -9.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x26c2…0cdfbacked Amelie Van Impe | 60c | 47.54$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$18.98 | 743 | 46.3%344 W · 399 L | -28.9wins | -0.04per pick | 50cpaid | -9.5%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xda77…683fbacked Amelie Van Impe | 67c | 45.05$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.69 | 5,416 | 48.6%2,633 W · 2,783 L | +14.5wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | -9.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xabbc…04a3backed Amelie Van Impe | 75c | 39.75$30 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$9.75 | 189 | 57.7%109 W · 80 L | +3.6wins | +0.02per pick | 56cpaid | +2.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x26d0…566ebacked Amelie Van Impe | 78c | 30$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.66 | 485 | 52.4%254 W · 231 L | +7.0wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +3.8%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1b4c…d6a2backed Amelie Van Impe | 49c | 22.5$11 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$11.43 | 41 | 24.4%10 W · 31 L | -5.7wins | -0.14per pick | 38cpaid | -37.3%equal weight | 40-0.09 edge/pick |
| 0xc7b3…d0eebacked Amelie Van Impe | 69c | 20.03$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.25 | 32 | 53.1%17 W · 15 L | +1.8wins | +0.06per pick | 48cpaid | +4.9%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x293c…dcbabacked Amelie Van Impe | 68c | 20$14 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.4 | 360 | 53.1%191 W · 169 L | -9.2wins | -0.03per pick | 56cpaid | -5.3%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.