NHL · resolved market
KHL: Amur Khabarovsk vs. Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x5b528bf8d8c841fde03a248597728b45f601fff4b5d4b8e77585d620ce0bf963
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Amur Khabarovskof Amur Khabarovsk, Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- NHLevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $2,177
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $2,214
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $2,177 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in NHL is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in NHL | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xb9b4…75a0backed Amur Khabarovsk | 54c | 823$444 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$378.58 | 85 | 44.7%38 W · 47 L | -4.1wins | -0.05per pick | 50cpaid | -10.8%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x54a2…5dfebacked Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 45c | 445.79$200 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$200 | 52 | 51.9%27 W · 25 L | +2.0wins | +0.04per pick | 48cpaid | +8%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x29c0…efaabacked Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 46c | 372.44$171 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$171.32 | 1,636 | 50.4%825 W · 811 L | -20.9wins | -0.01per pick | 52cpaid | -1.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3c15…45a0backed Amur Khabarovsk | 57c | 100.58$58 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$43.08 | 80 | 50%40 W · 40 L | -5.5wins | -0.07per pick | 57cpaid | -10.7%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xabf6…129dbacked Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 44c | 98.33$43 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42.8 | 110 | 50.9%56 W · 54 L | -2.7wins | -0.02per pick | 53cpaid | -8.2%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x9555…889abacked Amur Khabarovsk | 58c | 70.59$41 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$29.47 | 425 | 58.6%249 W · 176 L | -8.8wins | -0.02per pick | 61cpaid | -4.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x84c6…68dabacked Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 45c | 67.22$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 10 | 30%3 W · 7 L | -1.7wins | -0.17per pick | 47cpaid | -29.5%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 53c | 55.7$29 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$29.48 | 1,846 | 57.2%1,055 W · 791 L | +85.0wins | +0.05per pick | 53cpaid | +7.6%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x20a8…d960backed Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 40c | 50.65$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.38 | 366 | 62%227 W · 139 L | +39.1wins | +0.11per pick | 51cpaid | +19.2%equal weight | 61+0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x1f8b…a0cabacked Amur Khabarovsk | 57c | 50$29 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$21.5 | 10 | 50%5 W · 5 L | -1.1wins | -0.11per pick | 61cpaid | -18.1%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x15c5…4692backed Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 43c | 49$21 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$21.15 | 279 | 47.3%132 W · 147 L | +1.5wins | +0.01per pick | 47cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 510.00 edge/pick |
| 0xce9d…3c05backed Amur Khabarovsk | 42c | 47.62$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$27.62 | 254 | 49.6%126 W · 128 L | -15.0wins | -0.06per pick | 55cpaid | -12.1%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0xea6a…3ee2backed Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 58c | 47.62$28 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$27.62 | 524 | 51%267 W · 257 L | +7.8wins | +0.01per pick | 49cpaid | -0.2%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xd37a…2358backed Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk | 43c | 45.89$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.64 | 865 | 49.1%425 W · 440 L | -4.6wins | -0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -1.3%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0f3a…7dcbbacked Amur Khabarovsk | 62c | 36.81$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.81 | 22 | 40.9%9 W · 13 L | -2.7wins | -0.12per pick | 53cpaid | -26%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0xf48e…1e01backed Amur Khabarovsk | 55c | 19$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.55 | 46 | 52.2%24 W · 22 L | -0.8wins | -0.02per pick | 54cpaid | -3.7%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in NHL and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.