Tennis · resolved market
ITF Kamen: Hazem Naw vs Adrian Oetzbach
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x7d89fb04fb9e972a1568148da2d010fec60bd044285760a7c9797fc422a4c5e8
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Hazem Nawof Hazem Naw, Adrian Oetzbach
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Tennisevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $1,763
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $1,798
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $1,763 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Tennis is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Tennis | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xe911…3d4ebacked Hazem Naw | 55c | 1,079$593 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$486.16 | 4,426 | 51.8%2,291 W · 2,135 L | +136.7wins | +0.03per pick | 49cpaid | +0.4%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xd034…eecebacked Adrian Oetzbach | 44c | 917.5$405 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$405.1 | 2,735 | 34%931 W · 1,804 L | -13.2wins | 0.00per pick | 35cpaid | -2.8%equal weight | 490.00 edge/pick |
| 0x6318…46b1backed Adrian Oetzbach | 46c | 345.17$160 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$159.99 | 5,261 | 28.8%1,514 W · 3,747 L | -19.4wins | 0.00per pick | 29cpaid | -1.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xfd3e…5a7abacked Hazem Naw | 55c | 212.63$117 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$95.79 | 896 | 63.7%571 W · 325 L | +63.2wins | +0.07per pick | 57cpaid | +12.5%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x74f9…6024backed Hazem Naw | 54c | 50$27 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$23 | 561 | 53.7%301 W · 260 L | +19.9wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +4.2%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x0d2d…7ff5backed Hazem Naw | 36c | 46.76$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$29.9 | 8,505 | 42.6%3,619 W · 4,886 L | -166.3wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -21.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x204f…ba2cbacked Adrian Oetzbach | 44c | 45$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.95 | 371 | 53.9%200 W · 171 L | +6.7wins | +0.02per pick | 52cpaid | +2.3%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xb4d2…ce99backed Adrian Oetzbach | 40c | 44$18 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$17.6 | 4,921 | 38.7%1,905 W · 3,016 L | -20.0wins | 0.00per pick | 39cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x8951…dfcfbacked Adrian Oetzbach | 45c | 33$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.85 | 258 | 58.1%150 W · 108 L | -3.1wins | -0.01per pick | 59cpaid | +1.1%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xa578…6702backed Hazem Naw | 49c | 29.96$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$15.28 | 1,588 | 47%746 W · 842 L | -24.2wins | -0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -3.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xdbdd…a5debacked Adrian Oetzbach | 60c | 24.7$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$14.89 | 6,439 | 54.4%3,502 W · 2,937 L | +285.2wins | +0.04per pick | 50cpaid | +26.3%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xb7f3…d6dcbacked Hazem Naw | 69c | 22.21$15 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$6.81 | 870 | 60.2%524 W · 346 L | +28.4wins | +0.03per pick | 57cpaid | +5.1%equal weight | 54+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x4628…d573backed Adrian Oetzbach | 51c | 20.39$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.4 | 26 | 61.5%16 W · 10 L | +0.9wins | +0.03per pick | 58cpaid | +13.8%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xfe74…3916backed Hazem Naw | 50c | 20$10 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$10 | 3 | 33.3%1 W · 2 L | -0.8wins | -0.26per pick | 60cpaid | -33.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x14f3…0796backed Adrian Oetzbach | 67c | 15.29$10 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$10.24 | 1,234 | 46.3%571 W · 663 L | +8.7wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | -4.1%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Tennis and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.