Valorant · resolved market
Valorant: ULF Esports vs Team Vitality (BO3)
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x871d07a18c12dcbaf2e3634685c7ac07ee5501205e923017c1a67c82b9915630
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Team Vitalityof ULF Esports, Team Vitality
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Valorantevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $16,830
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $17,877
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $16,830 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 15 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Valorant is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Valorant | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xed2c…9597backed ULF Esports | 16c | 2,240$363 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$363.11 | 50 | 48%24 W · 26 L | -0.4wins | -0.01per pick | 49cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 49-0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x3542…c3c8backed ULF Esports | 17c | 1,507$261 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$261.1 | 285 | 48.4%138 W · 147 L | +14.4wins | +0.05per pick | 43cpaid | +16%equal weight | 55+0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x377c…91aebacked ULF Esports | 16c | 1,500$240 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$240 | 8 | 12.5%1 W · 7 L | -1.1wins | -0.13per pick | 26cpaid | -37.5%equal weight | 46-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x12a1…4e4dbacked ULF Esports | 2c | 1,232$22 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$22.1 | 14 | 50%7 W · 7 L | -0.1wins | -0.01per pick | 51cpaid | -7%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xba05…f8c0backed ULF Esports | 16c | 1,000$163 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$163.25 | 312 | 32.7%102 W · 210 L | +3.6wins | +0.01per pick | 32cpaid | +1.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x13fa…3facbacked ULF Esports | 17c | 735.12$125 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$124.97 | 34 | 38.2%13 W · 21 L | +0.9wins | +0.03per pick | 35cpaid | +6.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x5832…f585backed ULF Esports | 14c | 701.54$100 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$100 | 5 | 0%0 W · 5 L | -1.5wins | -0.30per pick | 30cpaid | -100%equal weight | 44-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x53ab…65aabacked ULF Esports | 14c | 613.15$86 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$85.97 | 551 | 52.5%289 W · 262 L | +20.7wins | +0.04per pick | 49cpaid | +8.7%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xb6ca…e7a5backed ULF Esports | 18c | 277.78$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 13 | 30.8%4 W · 9 L | -1.5wins | -0.12per pick | 42cpaid | -35.7%equal weight | 46-0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x8b55…d74bbacked ULF Esports | 15c | 199.98$30 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$30 | 867 | 47.5%412 W · 455 L | -2.9wins | 0.00per pick | 48cpaid | +1.8%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0x84f7…ade1backed ULF Esports | 16c | 198$32 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31.68 | 85 | 51.8%44 W · 41 L | +4.5wins | +0.05per pick | 47cpaid | +12.6%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x4255…1792backed ULF Esports | 15c | 177.9$27 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$26.69 | 160 | 41.9%67 W · 93 L | +6.9wins | +0.04per pick | 38cpaid | +8%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xf360…6726backed ULF Esports | 19c | 80$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.2 | 8 | 25%2 W · 6 L | +0.6wins | +0.08per pick | 17cpaid | +48.6%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xf16d…b7f9backed ULF Esports | 16c | 79.6$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$12.37 | 30 | 46.7%14 W · 16 L | +2.3wins | +0.08per pick | 39cpaid | +12%equal weight | 55+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x0969…b289backed Team Vitality | 78c | 21.41$17 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$4.71 | 75 | 61.3%46 W · 29 L | +5.5wins | +0.07per pick | 54cpaid | +16.4%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Valorant and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 4 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- Valorant: ULF Esports vs Team Vitality (BO3)this page
- Team Vitality to win a map?No won
- Valorant: ULF Esports vs Team Vitality - Map 1 WinnerTeam Vitality won
- Valorant: ULF Esports vs Team Vitality - Map 2 WinnerTeam Vitality won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.