Cricket · resolved market
T20 Blast, Women: Warwickshire vs Essex
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0x9f678af3f56f0b7781fff5b9ee32d542a5fcad628f2e8fa438fe9a97d1e4078e
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Warwickshireof Warwickshire, Essex
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- Cricketevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $4,670
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $4,573
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $4,670 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 18 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in Cricket is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in Cricket | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0xadfb…c2efbacked Essex | 48c | 943.3$456 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$456.47 | 641 | 43.1%276 W · 365 L | -10.6wins | -0.02per pick | 45cpaid | -18.6%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x6b68…08bbbacked Warwickshire | 51c | 939$484 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$455.44 | 10 | 70%7 W · 3 L | +2.0wins | +0.20per pick | 50cpaid | +24.4%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x7e12…d0ecbacked Essex | 12c | 800$95 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$95 | 134 | 18.7%25 W · 109 L | +3.6wins | +0.03per pick | 16cpaid | +106.9%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x8a80…11c5backed Essex | 22c | 203.86$44 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$44 | 97 | 46.4%45 W · 52 L | -2.6wins | -0.03per pick | 49cpaid | -17.9%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xddb6…b9b3backed Essex | 21c | 198.31$42 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$42.3 | 220 | 36.4%80 W · 140 L | -23.6wins | -0.11per pick | 47cpaid | -37.2%equal weight | 39-0.10 edge/pick |
| 0x14e7…a32cbacked Essex | 30c | 158.77$47 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$46.92 | 159 | 36.5%58 W · 101 L | -12.5wins | -0.08per pick | 44cpaid | -27.4%equal weight | 42-0.07 edge/pick |
| 0xe8e0…7eecbacked Essex | 23c | 137$31 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$31.07 | 155 | 50.3%78 W · 77 L | +2.6wins | +0.02per pick | 49cpaid | -10.9%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x1ccb…6cb3backed Warwickshire | 61c | 112.31$69 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$43.8 | 9 | 55.6%5 W · 4 L | +0.1wins | +0.02per pick | 54cpaid | -4.2%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xeaac…d71dbacked Essex | 43c | 108.34$46 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$46.25 | 492 | 47.2%232 W · 260 L | +4.5wins | +0.01per pick | 46cpaid | +4.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7a5d…54dbbacked Essex | 12c | 100.27$12 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$11.97 | 569 | 37.1%211 W · 358 L | -2.7wins | 0.00per pick | 38cpaid | -20.9%equal weight | 500.00 edge/pick |
| 0xa509…ae46backed Warwickshire | 77c | 95$73 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$22.25 | 654 | 51.1%334 W · 320 L | +26.9wins | +0.04per pick | 47cpaid | -9.7%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0x5210…bd53backed Warwickshire | 60c | 67.65$41 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$26.82 | 258 | 48.4%125 W · 133 L | +1.8wins | +0.01per pick | 48cpaid | -3%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x775d…6bebbacked Essex | 39c | 52$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20.28 | 199 | 50.8%101 W · 98 L | +1.5wins | +0.01per pick | 50cpaid | -9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x6770…c3bdbacked Essex | 39c | 50$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19.5 | 115 | 45.2%52 W · 63 L | -3.7wins | -0.03per pick | 48cpaid | -22.3%equal weight | 47-0.03 edge/pick |
| 0x7b28…ff4fbacked Warwickshire | 74c | 50$37 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13 | 187 | 57.8%108 W · 79 L | +18.0wins | +0.10per pick | 48cpaid | +8.3%equal weight | 59+0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x629d…756cbacked Essex | 31c | 49$15 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$15.04 | 249 | 40.6%101 W · 148 L | -15.6wins | -0.06per pick | 47cpaid | -23.4%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x972b…78babacked Warwickshire | 60c | 34.99$21 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.09 | 763 | 51.6%394 W · 369 L | +29.9wins | +0.04per pick | 48cpaid | -7.9%equal weight | 54+0.04 edge/pick |
| 0xd4f9…84f7backed Warwickshire | 53c | 30$16 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.1 | 29 | 55.2%16 W · 13 L | +0.8wins | +0.03per pick | 52cpaid | -2.7%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in Cricket and say nothing about this market.
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.