South American Leagues · resolved market
O'Higgins FC vs. São Paulo FC: O/U 2.5
https://tailmypicks.com/m/0xa48d8250d52cd94ae3147552a171afa574faedc4747854295be5fdacfcbbfe77
Rebuilt .
What this market resolved to
- Winning outcome
- Underof Over, Under
- Resolved
- US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
- Scored in
- South American Leaguesevery record on this page is that Category’s
- Volume Polymarket published
- $3,833
- Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
- $3,999
Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $3,833 — the venue’s figure.
Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.
Who was on this market
All 16 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in South American Leagues is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.
| On this market | This wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wallet | Entry | Position | Result | P/L held | Qualified picks | Win rate | vs expected | Realizable edge | Avg entry | ROI per pick | Tail Score |
| 0x77bc…b91bbacked Over | 16c | 1,055$168 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$167.75 | 2,170 | 43.7%948 W · 1,222 L | -53.8wins | -0.02per pick | 46cpaid | -19.4%equal weight | 47-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0x1e52…91d6backed Over | 17c | 299$51 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50.83 | 188 | 28.7%54 W · 134 L | -4.5wins | -0.02per pick | 31cpaid | -18.3%equal weight | 48-0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xcc11…c87bbacked Under | 58c | 202.55$117 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$85.07 | 196 | 59.7%117 W · 79 L | +1.1wins | +0.01per pick | 59cpaid | +0.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xce9d…3c05backed Under | 66c | 151.52$100 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$51.52 | 85 | 56.5%48 W · 37 L | +1.6wins | +0.02per pick | 55cpaid | +4.6%equal weight | 52+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xad84…1897backed Over | 42c | 119.05$50 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$50 | 124 | 39.5%49 W · 75 L | -8.7wins | -0.07per pick | 47cpaid | -17.7%equal weight | 44-0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x8293…aaeebacked Over | 43c | 83.72$36 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$36 | 11 | 18.2%2 W · 9 L | -3.0wins | -0.27per pick | 46cpaid | -66.5%equal weight | 41-0.08 edge/pick |
| 0x2005…75eabacked Under | 78c | 65.07$51 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$14.06 | 5,757 | 45.4%2,611 W · 3,146 L | +94.0wins | +0.02per pick | 44cpaid | -7.5%equal weight | 52+0.02 edge/pick |
| 0xd4ee…e425backed Over | 44c | 56.82$25 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$25 | 42 | 35.7%15 W · 27 L | +1.7wins | +0.04per pick | 32cpaid | +16%equal weight | 53+0.03 edge/pick |
| 0xe7c2…4939backed Over | 36c | 55.56$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 12 | 33.3%4 W · 8 L | -1.7wins | -0.14per pick | 48cpaid | -42.8%equal weight | 45-0.05 edge/pick |
| 0x8a6b…2f6abacked Over | 42c | 47.62$20 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$20 | 50 | 56%28 W · 22 L | +5.4wins | +0.11per pick | 45cpaid | +17.1%equal weight | 58+0.07 edge/pick |
| 0x5981…3934backed Over | 43c | 44.19$19 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$19 | 150 | 41.3%62 W · 88 L | +2.2wins | +0.01per pick | 40cpaid | +7.9%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xadfb…c2efbacked Under | 57c | 39.69$23 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$17.07 | 1,668 | 51.7%863 W · 805 L | +18.0wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +5.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x7ea5…de7bbacked Under | 57c | 38.37$22 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$16.54 | 3,405 | 51.3%1,748 W · 1,657 L | +21.3wins | +0.01per pick | 51cpaid | +0.5%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0xf076…4079backed Over | 43c | 37.21$16 in | Lost — open this pick on its own page | -$16 | 12 | 41.7%5 W · 7 L | +0.3wins | +0.02per pick | 39cpaid | +2.4%equal weight | 51+0.01 edge/pick |
| 0x0f46…1db8backed Under | 59c | 33.72$20 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$13.72 | 11 | 72.7%8 W · 3 L | +2.1wins | +0.19per pick | 54cpaid | +38%equal weight | 56+0.06 edge/pick |
| 0x2463…f5b5backed Under | 59c | 20$12 in | Won — open this pick on its own page | +$8.2 | 108 | 62%67 W · 41 L | +3.3wins | +0.03per pick | 59cpaid | +6.2%equal weight | 53+0.02 edge/pick |
Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in South American Leagues and say nothing about this market.
The rest of this event
Polymarket sells these questions together. 7 in all. TailMyPicks has no name for an event — the venue publishes an identifier and no title — so they are listed by their own questions.
- O'Higgins FC vs. São Paulo FC: O/U 2.5this page
- O'Higgins FC vs. São Paulo FC: Both Teams to ScoreNo won
- O'Higgins FC vs. São Paulo FC: O/U 1.5Under won
- O'Higgins FC vs. São Paulo FC: O/U 3.5Under won
- O'Higgins FC vs. São Paulo FC: O/U 4.5Under won
- Spread: O'Higgins FC (-1.5)São Paulo FC won
- Spread: São Paulo FC (-2.5)O'Higgins FC won
Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.
TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.
- The market traded at least $500.
- The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
- The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
- The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.
Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.