TailMyPicks

Check any Polymarket wallet’s real record.

MLB · resolved market

Kansas City Royals vs. Minnesota Twins

Rebuilt .

What this market resolved to

Winning outcome
Minnesota Twinsof Kansas City Royals, Minnesota Twins
Resolved
US/Eastern, the zone Polymarket writes its markets in
Scored in
MLBevery record on this page is that Category’s
Volume Polymarket published
$12,717
Volume TailMyPicks’s own read summed
$12,366

Both are shown because TailMyPicks only trusts a market it can reconcile: it reads every trade itself and compares its own total against the venue’s before scoring anything. The threshold below was applied to $12,717 the venue’s figure.

Every figure here describes what TailMyPicks scored — positions held to resolution in markets that cleared the thresholds below. It is not a Polymarket account balance, and open positions are not counted anywhere on this site.

Who was on this market

All 21 wallets that hold a qualified pick on this market, biggest position first. Ordered by position size rather than by score, because this is a post-mortem of one market — a strong wallet’s small pick does not belong above a large committed one. Each wallet’s record in MLB is on its own row, so one correct call here is not mistaken for a track record.

On this marketThis wallet’s whole record in MLB
WalletEntryPositionResultP/L heldQualified picksWin ratevs expectedRealizable edgeAvg entryROI per pickTail Score
0x7239…6591backed Kansas City Royals51c8,195$4,176 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$4,176.275040%20 W · 30 L-5.2wins-0.10per pick50cpaid-19.9%equal weight42-0.07 edge/pick
0xb786…b18dbacked Minnesota Twins49c5,890$2,886 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$3,003.721,59150.3%801 W · 790 L+68.9wins+0.04per pick46cpaid+1.4%equal weight55+0.04 edge/pick
0xe401…7b88backed Minnesota Twins49c2,081$1,022 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$1,059.549,72846.3%4,506 W · 5,222 L+32.8wins0.00per pick46cpaid-8.5%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0x994e…9cf5backed Minnesota Twins49c1,597$782 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$814.321147.9%101 W · 110 L+1.4wins+0.01per pick47cpaid+0.5%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xfaa2…93ccbacked Kansas City Royals52c956.84$500 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$50024844%109 W · 139 L-6.2wins-0.03per pick46cpaid-1.8%equal weight47-0.02 edge/pick
0x172b…e2cdbacked Kansas City Royals56c830.39$469 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$4693262.5%20 W · 12 L+2.3wins+0.07per pick55cpaid+15.6%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0xa6a8…5009backed Minnesota Twins44c404.62$179 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$225.432,27443.2%983 W · 1,291 L+43.8wins+0.02per pick41cpaid-8.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x187b…26bfbacked Kansas City Royals50c300$150 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1505352.8%28 W · 25 L+3.0wins+0.06per pick47cpaid+12.8%equal weight54+0.04 edge/pick
0x9716…378abacked Minnesota Twins51c205$105 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$100.4550852.6%267 W · 241 L+2.6wins+0.01per pick52cpaid+2%equal weight510.00 edge/pick
0x8b7e…6a9fbacked Kansas City Royals50c200$100 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$1002,03352.4%1,066 W · 967 L-35.5wins-0.02per pick54cpaid-3.2%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x03f4…d1a7backed Kansas City Royals50c200$100 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$100425%1 W · 3 L-1.0wins-0.26per pick51cpaid-46.8%equal weight46-0.04 edge/pick
0xd9a0…88eebacked Minnesota Twins45c152.22$69 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$83.2128348.8%138 W · 145 L+6.3wins+0.02per pick47cpaid+2.7%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x11d7…52e1backed Minnesota Twins51c117.21$60 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$57.1980955.5%449 W · 360 L+12.4wins+0.02per pick54cpaid+1.2%equal weight52+0.01 edge/pick
0xf0b0…8cabbacked Minnesota Twins45c100$45 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$5563942.7%273 W · 366 L+4.0wins+0.01per pick42cpaid-9.1%equal weight51+0.01 edge/pick
0xdc4b…5a92backed Kansas City Royals50c100$50 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$502,26753.3%1,208 W · 1,059 L-12.4wins-0.01per pick54cpaid-1%equal weight49-0.01 edge/pick
0x3d8c…726cbacked Kansas City Royals44c100$44 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$443743.2%16 W · 21 L-1.1wins-0.03per pick46cpaid-19.4%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0xd3b1…6f55backed Kansas City Royals50c97.08$49 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$48.544134.1%14 W · 27 L-4.8wins-0.12per pick46cpaid-29.4%equal weight42-0.07 edge/pick
0xa337…9e54backed Kansas City Royals50c50$25 inLost — open this pick on its own page-$2594455.3%522 W · 422 L-2.9wins0.00per pick56cpaid-0.7%equal weight500.00 edge/pick
0xef63…96cbbacked Minnesota Twins51c50$26 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$24.546753.7%251 W · 216 L-11.0wins-0.02per pick56cpaid-5.5%equal weight48-0.02 edge/pick
0x0643…d46bbacked Minnesota Twins51c41.18$21 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$20.1840557.8%234 W · 171 L+7.6wins+0.02per pick56cpaid+3.3%equal weight52+0.02 edge/pick
0x5e42…9003backed Minnesota Twins48c36$17 inWon — open this pick on its own page+$18.7243250.7%219 W · 213 L+10.9wins+0.03per pick48cpaid+0.6%equal weight53+0.02 edge/pick

Entry is the average price this wallet paid on the side it backed, so being right at 20c is distinguishable from being right at 95c. Position is what it was left holding in shares, with what it spent underneath. Result opens that one pick on a page of its own, which is the link to send somebody. P/L held is what that position would have been worth held to resolution — not cash the wallet withdrew, because selling early is still a correct forecast. The seven columns on the right describe the wallet’s whole record in MLB and say nothing about this market.

Not every trade counts. A Pick has to clear four thresholds to be scored.

TailMyPicks scores a wallet on what it can actually be judged on: positions held to resolution, in markets with enough volume to be real, at prices where being right was not already priced in.

  • The market traded at least $500.
  • The entry price was between 0.00 and 0.80 — a near-certainty is not a call.
  • The position was at least $10 — dust is not a position.
  • The market has resolved, so there is a right answer to grade against.

Thresholds behind these numbers: set by an operator decision, not measured.